Journal of Applied Economic Research
ISSN 2712-7435
An Economic Alternative to Replacing Centralized Gas Supply with Autonomous Biogas Facilities in Russian Cities
G.S. Chebotareva, A.A. Dvinayninov
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin
Abstract
The main trend in energy development is to increase energy efficiency by reducing the use of limited natural resources, the spread of renewable energy, and reducing the negative impact on the environment. An effective response to these challenges is the use of biogas plants that produce clean energy and solve the environmental problems of waste disposal and recycling. The purpose of the article is to assess the economic efficiency of replacing district gas supply with autonomous biogas plants in public utilities. A hypothesis has been put forward that the feasibility of using such technologies depends on climatic features and the specific provisions of state regulation of prices and gas consumption rates. A cost approach was applied that assesses the overall structure of equipment costs, as well as a comparative assessment method according to the principle “with / without a biogas plant”, and a scenario analysis, the criterion of which is the size of the family owning the plant. An auxiliary method for forecasting retail and economically justified prices for natural gas for the population was used. The object of calculations is the “HomeBiogas” installation intended for home use. Three Russian cities were chosen as territorial subjects: Yekaterinburg, Irkutsk and Krasnodar. The cities which differ significantly in their natural characteristics and approaches to the formation of retail gas prices. It has been proved that although the average monthly temperatures differ significantly in the cities considered, none of them has a constant temperature exceeding the required standard value of 17°C. In each case, the initial capital investment is driven up by the cost of installing additional insulation and heating systems. This equalizes the costs of warmer and colder areas. Therefore, the climatic features of cities are not significant and do not affect the economic efficiency of using a biogas plant. In turn, state regulation of prices and norms of gas consumption by the population is of decisive importance. The findings are of theoretical and practical importance. The methodology can be applied to assess the efficiency of using biogas plants in industry and gasification projects in the remote areas of Russia.
Keywords
biogas; biogas facility; centralized gas supply; feasibility; economic effect; natural features; gas price; cost-based approach; comparative assessment; cities; Russia.
JEL classification
O22, Q35, Q42References
1. Landi, D., Castorani, V., Germani, M. (2019). Interactive energetic, environmental and economic analysis of renewable hybrid energy system. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, Vol. 13, Issue 3, 885–899. DOI: 10.1007/s12008-019-00554-x.
2. Mehrpooya, M., Mohammadi, M., Ahmadi, E. (2018). Techno-economic-environmental study of hybrid power supply system: A case study in Iran. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, Vol. 25, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2017.10.007.
3. Karmaker, A.K., Ahmed, M.R., Hossain, M.A., Sikder, M.M. (2018). Feasibility Assessment and Design of Hybrid Renewable Energy Based Electric Vehicle Charging Station in Bangladesh. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 39, 189–202. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.035.
4. Yazdi, M., Nedjati, A., Zarei, E., Abbassi, R. (2020). A reliable risk analysis approach using an extension of best-worst method based on democratic-autocratic decision-making style. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 256, 120418. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120418.
5. Wibowo, S., Grandhi, S. (2017). Performance Evaluation of Recoverable End-of-life Products in the Reverse Supply Chain. Proceedings 16th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science. IEEE, 215–220. DOI: 10.1109/ICIS.2017.7959996.
6. Gigli, S., Landi, D., Germani, M. (2019). Cost-benefit analysis of a circular economy project: A study on a recycling system for end-of-life tyres. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 229, 680–694 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.223.
7. Kamali, M., Hewage, K., Milani, A.S. (2018). Life cycle sustainability performance assessment framework for residential modular buildings: Aggregated sustainability indices. Building and Environment, Vol. 138, 21–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.019.
8. Angelis-Dimakis, A., Alexandratou, A., Balzarini, A. (2016). Value chain upgrading in a textile dyeing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 138, 237–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.137.
9. Wadi, B., Golmakani, A., Manovic, V., Nabavi, S.A. (2021). Effect of combined primary and secondary amine loadings on the adsorption mechanism of CO2 and CH4 in biogas. Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 420, Part 3, 130294. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130294.
10. Duman, A.C., Guler, O. (2018). Techno-Economic Analysis of Off-Grid PV/Wind/Fuel Cell Hybrid System Combinations with a Comparison of Regularly and Seasonally Occupied Households. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 42, 107–126. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.06.029.
11. Deane, J.P., Ó Gallachóir, B.P., McKeogh, E.J. (2010). Techno-economic review of existing and new pumped hydro energy storage plant. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, Issue 4, 1293–1302. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.015.
12. Barrios, J.A., Cano, A., Rivera, F.F., Cisneros, M.E., Durán, U. (2021). Efficiency of integrated electrooxidation and anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Biotechnology for Biofuels, Vol. 14, Issue 1, 81. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-021-01929-7.
13. Mazlan, M., Najafi, G., Hoseini, S.S., Mamat, R., Alenzi, R.A., Mofijur, M., Yusaf, T. (2021). Thermal efficiency analysis of a nanofluid-based micro combined heat and power system using CNG and biogas. Energy, Vol. 231, 120870. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.120870.
14. Dabiri, S., Kumar, P., Ebner, C., Rauch, W. (2021). On the effect of biogas bubbles in anaerobic digester mixing. Biochemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 173, 108088. DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2021.108088.
15. Karhinen, S., Huuki, H. (2019). Private and social benefits of a pumped hydro energy storage with increasing amount of wind power. Energy Economics, Vol. 81, Issue C, 942–959. DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.024.
16. Choe, U., Mustafa, A.M., Zhang, X., Sheng, K., Zhou, X., Wang, K. (2021). Effects of hydrothermal pretreatment and bamboo hydrochar addition on anaerobic digestion of tofu residue for biogas production. Bioresource Technology, Vol. 336, 125279. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125279.
17. Allouhi, A. (2019). Energetic, exergetic, economic and environmental (4 E) assessment process of wind power generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 235, 123–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.299.
18. Sorman, A.H., García-Muros, X., Pizarro-Irizar, C., González-Eguino, M. (2020). Lost (and found) in Transition: Expert stakeholder insights on low-carbon energy transitions in Spain. Energy Research & Social Science, Vol. 64, 101414. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101414.
19. Omrani, H., Alizadeh, A., Emrouznejad, A. (2018). Finding the optimal combination of power plants alternatives: a multi response Taguchi-neural network using TOPSIS and fuzzy best-worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 203, 210–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.238.
20. Rani, P., Mishra, A.R., Mardani, A., Cavallaro, F., Alrasheedi, M., Alrashidi, A. (2020). A novel approach to extended fuzzy TOPSIS based on new divergence measures for renewable energy sources selection. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 257, 120352. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120352.
21. Ghiasi, M., Esmaeilnamazi, S., Ghiasi, R., Fathi, M. (2020). Role of Renewable Energy Sources in Evaluating Technical and Economic Efficiency of Power Quality. Technology and Economics of Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy, Vol. 5, Issue 1, 1. DOI: 10.1007/s40866-019-0073-1.
22. Diemuodeke, E.O., Addo, A., Oko, C.O.C., Mulugetta, Y., Ojapah, M.M. (2019). Optimal Mapping of Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for Locations Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Algorithm. Renewable Energy, Vol. 134, 461–477. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.055.
23. Herbes, C., Roth, U., Wulf, S., Dahlin, J. (2020). Economic assessment of different biogas digestate processing technologies: A scenario-based analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 255, 120282. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120282.
24. Campello, L.D., Barros, R.M., Tiago Filho, G.L., dos Santos, I.F.S. (2021). Analysis of the economic viability of the use of biogas produced in wastewater treatment plants to generate electrical energy. Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 23, Issue 2, 2614–2629. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-020-00689-y.
25. Raucci, D., Agostinone, S., Carnevale, M. (2019). Technical and economic evaluation of renewable energy production in the Italian agricultural firm: Financing a biogas plant investment. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 15, Issue 4, 513–538. DOI: 10.1504/WREMSD.2019.102344.
26. Trovato, V., Kantharaj, B. (2020). Energy storage behind-the-meter with renewable generators: Techno-economic value of optimal imbalance management. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 118, 105813. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105813.
27. Zhang, Y., Yuan, J., Zhao, C., Lyu, L. (2020). Can dispersed wind power take off in China: A technical & institutional economics analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 256, 120475. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120475.
28. Kim, M.-H., Kim, D., Heo, J., Lee, D.-W. (2019). Techno-economic analysis of hybrid renewable energy system with solar district heating for net zero energy community. Energy, Vol. 187, 115916. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.115916.
29. Li, H., Mahmud, M.A., Arzaghi, E., Abbassi, R., Chen, D., Xu, B. (2020). Assessments of economic benefits for hydro-wind power systems: Development of advanced model and quantitative method for reducing the power wastage. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 277, 123823. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123823.
30. Zhang, C., Yang, J. (2019). Economic benefits assessments of “coal-to-electricity” project in rural residents heating based on life cycle cost. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 213, 217–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.077.
31. Wang, J., Chai, Y., Shao, Y., Qian, X. (2021). Techno-economic Assessment of Biogas Project: a Longitudinal Case Study from Japan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 164, 105174. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.
32. Kezembayeva, G.B. (2018). Development of methods for calculating the environmental and economic efficiency of waste treatment technologies. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, Vol. 9, Issue 7, 1624–1630. DOI: 10.14505/jemt.v9.7(31).25.
33. Savic, N., Katic, V., Dumnic, B., Milicevic, D., Corba, Z., Katic, N. (2019). The Investment Justification Estimate and Techno-economic and Ecological Aspects Analysis of the University Campus Microgrid. Electronics, Vol. 23, Issue 1, 26–38. DOI: 10.7251/ELS1923026S.
34. Bezmalinovic, D., Barbir, F., Tolj, I. (2013). Techno-economic analysis of PEM fuel cells role in photovoltaic-based systems for the remote base stations. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 38, Issue 1, 417–425. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.09.123.
35. Rad, M.A.V., Ghasempour, R., Rahdan, P., Mousavi, S., Arastounia, M. (2020). Techno-economic analysis of a hybrid system based on the cost-effective hydrogen production method for rural electrification, A case study in Iran. Energy, Vol. 190, 116421. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116421.
36. Gebrehiwot, K., Mondal, M.A.H., Ringler, C., Gebremeskel, A.G. (2019). Optimization and cost-benefit assessment of hybrid power systems for off-grid rural electrification in Ethiopia. Energy, Vol. 177, 234–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.095.
37. Aghahosseini, A., Bogdanov, D., Barbosa, L.S.N.S., Breyer, C. (2019). Analysing the feasibility of powering the Americas with renewable energy and inter-regional grid interconnections by 2030. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 105, 187–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.046.
38. Baldinelli, A., Barelli, L., Bidini, G., Discepoli, G. (2020). Economics of innovative high capacity-to-power energy storage technologies pointing at 100% renewable micro-grids. Journal of Energy Storage, Vol. 28, 101198. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101198.
39. Zhu, K., Victoria, M., Andresen, G.B., Greiner, M. (2020). Impact of climatic, technical and economic uncertainties on the optimal design of a coupled fossil-free electricity, heating and cooling system in Europe, Applied Energy, Vol. 262, 114500. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114500.
40. Adefarati, T., Obikoya, G.D. (2020). Assessment of Renewable Energy Technologies in a Standalone Microgrid System. International Journal of Engineering Research in Africa, Vol. 46, 146–167. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/JERA.46.146.
41. Schlachtberger, D.P., Brown, T., Schäfer, M., Schramm, S., Greiner, M. (2018). Cost optimal scenarios of a future highly renewable European electricity system: Exploring the influence of weather data, cost parameters and policy constraints. Energy, Vol. 163, 100–114. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.070.
42. Daraei, M., Avelin, A., Thorin, E. (2019). Optimization of a regional energy system including CHP plants and local PV system and hydropower: Scenarios for the County of Vastmanland in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 230, 1111–1127. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.086.
43. Kengam, S., Sreejith, S. (2019). An Efficient Energy Management System for Hybrid Renewable Energy Sources. 2019 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies, 8960201. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/i-PACT44901.2019.8960201.
44. Kobayashi, D., Ohtake, H., Takemoto, K., Hoang, V.N., Masuta, T. (2019). Reliability and Economic Efficiency in Power System with PV Considering Import Fuel Price Transition. 2019 IEEE PES GTD Grand International Conference and Exposition Asia, 8715868. IEEE, 752–756. DOI: 10.1109/GTDAsia.2019.8715868.
45. Caglayan, D.G., Ryberg, D.S., Heinrichs, H., Linssen, J., Stolten, D., RobiniusЮ M. (2019). The techno-economic potential of offshore wind energy with optimized future turbine designs in Europe. Applied Energy, Vol. 255, 113794. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113794.
46. Collins, S., Deane, P., Ó Gallachóir, B., Pfenninger, S., Staffell, I. (2018). Impacts of Inter-Annual Wind and Solar Variations on the European Power System. Joule, Vol. 2, Issue 10, 2076–2090. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.020.
47. Anwar, Y.A., Shafei, M.A.R., Ibrahim, D.K. (2018). An Economic Analysis of Rooftop Solar Power Plant and Energy Auditing for Commercial Building in Egypt. 2017 Saudi Arabia Smart Grid Conference, 17753631. IEEE, 1–6. DOI: 10.1109/SASG.2017.8356490.
48. Rentizelas, A., Melo, I.C., Alves Junior, P.N., Campoli, J.S., Aparecida do Nascimento Rebelatto, D. Multi-criteria efficiency assessment of international biomass supply chain pathways using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 237, 117690. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117690.
49. Briones-Hidrovo, A., Uche, J., Martínez-Gracia, A. (2019). Estimating the hidden ecological costs of hydropower through an ecosystem services balance: A case study from Ecuador. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 233, 33–42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.068.
50. Liang, C., Xin, S., Dongsheng, W., Xiuying, Y., Guodong, J. (2016). The ecological benefit–loss evaluation in a riverine wetland for hydropower projects – A case study of Xiaolangdi reservoir in the Yellow River, China. Ecological Engineering, Vol. 96, 34–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.12.037.
51. Li, X.J., Zhang, J., Xu, L.Y. (2015)ю An evaluation of ecological losses from hydropower development in Tibet. Ecological Engineering, Vol. 76, 178–185. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.03.034.
52. Nieves, J.A., Aristizabal, A.J., Dyner, I., Baez, O., Ospina, D.H. (2019). Energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions analysis in Colombia: A LEAP model application. Energy, Vol. 169, 380–397. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.051.
53. Camioto, F.D.C., Mariano, E.B., Santana, N.B., Yamashita, B.D., Rebelatto, D.A.D.N. (2018). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Efficiency: An Analysis of Latin American Countries. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, Vol. 37, Issue 6, 2116–2123. DOI: 10.1002/ep.12877.
54. Brozyna, J., Mentel, G., Ivanová, E., Sorokin, G. (2019). Classification of Renewable Sources of Electricity in the Context of Sustainable Development of the New EU Member States. Energies, Vol. 12, 2271. DOI: 10.3390/en12122271.
55. Ho, H.-X.T. (2018). Forecasting of CO2 Emissions, Renewable Energy Consumption and Economic Growth in Vietnam Using Grey Models. Proceedings 2018 4th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development, 8595679. IEEE, 452–455. DOI: 10.1109/GTSD.2018.8595679.
56. Kozarcanin, S., Liu, H., Andresen, G.B. (2019). 21st Century Climate Change Impacts on Key Properties of a Large-Scale Renewable-Based Electricity System. Joule, Vol. 3, Issue 4, 992–1005. DOI: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.02.001.
57. Ayodele, T.R., Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O., Alao, M.A. (2018). Economic and environmental assessment of electricity generation using biogas from organic fraction of municipal solid waste for the city of Ibadan, Nigeria. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 203, 718–735. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.282.
58. Fei, F., Wen, Z., Huang, S., De Clercq, D. (2018). Mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste: Energy efficiency, environmental impact and economic feasibility analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 178, 731–739. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.060.
59. Sassanelli, C., Rosa, P., Rocca, R., Terzi, S. (2019). Circular economy performance assessment methods: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 229, 440–453. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.019.
60. Park, Y.S., Egilmez, G., Kucukvar, M. (2016). Emergy and end-point impact assessment of agricultural and food production in the United States: A supply chain-linked Ecologically-based Life Cycle Assessment. Ecological Indicators, Vol. 62, 117–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.11.045.
61. Wang, X., Chen, Y., Sui, P., Gao, W., Qin, F., Wu, X., Xiong, J. (2014). Efficiency and sustainability analysis of biogas and electricity production from a large-scale biogas project in China: An emergy evaluation based on LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 65, 234–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.001.
62. Ganieva, I.A., Maslennikova, S.M., Kurbanova, M.G., Gaaze, Z.V. (2013). Teoretiko-metodologicheskie aspekty tekhniko-ekonomicheskoi otsenki proizvodstva biogaza iz otkhodov selskogo khoziaistva (Theoretical and methodological aspects of the technical and economic evaluation of biogas production from agricultural waste). Agrarnyi vestnik Urala (Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals), No. 8 (114), 52–54. (In Russ.). Available at: avu.usaca.ru/ru/issues/54/articles/917.
63. Markov, V.A., Devianin, S.N., Shimchenko, S.P. (2013). Ispolzovanie biogaza dlia polucheniia elektroenergii v agropromyshlennykh kompleksakh (Utilization Biogas Concept for Generating Electric Power in Agro Industrial Complexes). Transport na alternativnom toplive (Alternative Fuel Transport), No. 6 (36), 45–50. (In Russ.). Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_21007524_13084084.pdf.
64. Koshelev, V.M., Nurgaliev, T.I. (2015). Ekonomicheskie aspekty vnedreniia tekhnologii proizvodstva biogaza v sel'skokhoziaistvennoi organizatsii (Economic Aspects of Biogas Technology Introduction in Farm Enterprises). Vestnik FGOU VPO «Moskovskii gosudarstvennyi agroinzhenernyi universitet imeni V.P. Goriachkina» (s 2020 goda – Agroinzheneriia) (Vestnik of Moscow State Agroengineering University named after V.P. Goryachkin), No. 6 (70), 50–55. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_25112291_48052194.pdf.
65. Meyer, E.L., Overen, O.K., Obileke, K., Botha, J.J., Anderson, J.J., Koatla, T.A.B., Thubela, T., Khamkham, T.I., Ngqeleni, V.D. (2021). Financial and economic feasibility of bio-digesters for rural residential demand-side management and sustainable development. Energy Reports, Vol. 7, 1728–1741. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.013.
66. Yin, Y., Chen, S., Li, X., Jiang, B., Zhao, J.R., Nong, G. (2021). Comparative analysis of different CHP systems using biogas for the cassava starch plants. Energy, Vol. 232, 121028. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121028.
67. Zhou, H., Yang, Q., Gul, E., Shi, M., Li, J., Yang, M., Yang, H., Chen, B., Zhao, H., Yan, Y., Erdogan, G., Bartocci, P., Fantozzi, F. (2021). Decarbonizing university campuses through the production of biogas from food waste: An LCA analysis. Renewable Energy, Vol. 176, 565–578. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.007.
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by grant of the President of the Russian Federation (МК-4549.2021.2).
About Authors
Chebotareva Galina Sergeevna
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Department of Energy and Industrial Enterprises Management Systems, School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID 0000-0001-7496-4927; e-mail: galina_ch90@mail.ru.
Dvinayninov Artyom Andreevich
Lecturer, Department of Energy and Industrial Enterprises Management Systems, School of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID 0000-0002-9852-1861;e-mail: dvinayninov@mail.ru.
For citation
Chebotareva G.S., Dvinayninov A.A. An Economic Alternative to Replacing Centralized Gas Supply with Autonomous Biogas Facilities in Russian Cities. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2021, Vol. 20, No. 3, 582-612. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.3.023.
Article info
Received June 28, 2021; Revised July 30, 2021; Accepted August 12, 2021.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.3.023
Download full text article:
~969 KB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
29.09.2021)
Created / Updated: 2 September 2015 / 20 September 2021
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
Contact us
Rector's Office
Rector, Dr. Victor Koksharov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-45-03, e-mail: rector@urfu.ru
Vice-Rector for International Relations, Dr. Maxim Khomyakov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-46-27, e-mail: Maksim.Khomyakov@urfu.ru