Journal of Applied Economic Research
ISSN 2712-7435
Methodological Approach to the Environmental and Economic Assessment of Biogas Energy Projects
Elena R. Magaril, Leonid D. Gitelman, Anzhelika P. Karaeva, Andrey V. Kiselev, Mikhail V. Kozhevnikov
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Abstract
Efficient energy supply of industrial enterprises, especially energy-intensive ones, together with a negative environmental impact decrease, is considered to be an important issue throughout the fourth energy transition and the implementation of circular economy principles that are aimed at resource optimization, energy saving, carbon-free technologies and zero waste production. In this context, quite a significant amount of accumulated and annually increasing organic waste could become a valuable resource for Russia. Thereby, biogas technologies development and implementation is one of the potential directions that determine the efficiency of its energy use. The purpose of the study is to develop a methodological approach for the environmental and economic assessment of biogas energy projects. The possibility of introducing biogas and other renewable energy installations into the Russian regional energy system is considered in this manuscript. The methodological features of the environmental and economic assessment of energy facilities are substantiated, taking into account the key performance indicators corresponding to the implementation of circular economy strategies. Alternative approaches to the environmental and economic assessment of investment projects are proposed using an integral indicator of environmental and economic efficiency, which is calculated both with: (a) positive and negative consequences of an environmental and economic entities that are significant for the region; (b) aggregated private indicators, which take into account the intensity of nature use and environmental friendliness of projects; (c) complex score. The proposed approach can be used for the environmental and economic assessment of the introduction of biogas technologies efficiency, as well as through the comparison of alternatives for modernization projects in the energy sector.
Keywords
circular economy; energy transition; regional energy policies; biogas techniques; environmental and economic assessment; carbon-free energy; zero waste production
JEL classification
Q01, Q42, Q51References
1. Benton, D., Hazel, J. (2015). The Circular Economy in Japan. March 2015. The Institution of environment sciences. Available at: www.the-ies.org/analysis/circular-economy-japan.
2. Pomponi, F., Moncaster, A. (2017). A Theoretical Framework for Circular Economy Research in the Built Environment. In: Building Information Modelling, Building Performance, Design and Smart Construction. Edited by M. Dastbaz, C. Gorse, A. Moncaster. Springer, 31–44. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50346-2_3.
3. Gerasimenko, D., Nikolaeva, I. (2017). Tsirkuliarnaia ekonomika v Rossii v kontekste Tselei ustoichivogo razvitiia OON i Goda ekologii (Circular economy in the context of implementing the concept of sustainable development). Mosty [Bridges], Vol. 10, No 3. (In Russ.).
4. Fagarassy, C. (2017). The Theoretical Background of Circular Economy and the Importance of it’s Application at Renewable Energy Systems. Available at: www.researchgate.net/publication/319403544.
5. Lahti, T., Wincent, J., Parida, V. (2018). A Definition and Theoretical Review of the Circular Economy, Value Creation, and Sustainable Business Models: Where Are We Now and Where Should Research Move in the Future? Sustainability, Vol. 10, Issue 8, 2799. DOI: 10.3390/su10082799.
6. Lacy, P. Rutqvist, J. (2015). Waste to Wealth. The Circular Economy Advantage. UK, Palgrave Macmillan, 264 p. DOI: 10.1057/9781137530707.
7. Gabriel, C.A., Kirkwood, J. (2016). Business models for model businesses: Lessons from renewable energy entrepreneurs in developing countries. Energy Policy, Vol. 95, Issue C, 336–349. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.006.
8. Albores, P., Petridis, K., Dey, P.K. (2016). Analysing efficiency of Waste to Energy Systems: Using Data Envelopment Analysis in Municipal Solid Waste Management. Procedia Environmental Sciences, Vol. 35, 265–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.007.
9. Cioca, L.I., Ferronato, N., Viotti, P., Magaril, E., Ragazzi, M., Torretta, V., Rada, E.C. (2018). Risk Assessment in a Materials Recycling Facility: Perspectives for Reducing Operational Issues. Resources, Vol. 7, Issue 4, 85. DOI: 10.3390/resources7040085.
10. Iveroth, S.P., Vernay, A., Mulder, K., Brandt, N. (2013). Implications of systems integration at the urban level: the case of Hammarby Sjöstad, Stockholm. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 48, 220–231. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.09.012.
11. Iveroth, S.P. (2013). The Potential of the Infrastructural System of Hammarby Sjöstad in Stockholm Sweden. Energy Policy, Vol. 59, 716–726. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.04.027.
12. Batova, N., Sachek, P., Tochitskaia, I. (2018). Tsirkuliarnaia ekonomika v deistvii: formy organizatsii i luchshie praktiki [Circular economy in action: organization forms and best practices]. BEROC Green Economy Policy Paper Series, No. 5. Available at: beroc.org/upload/medialibrary/321/32121ce6e23d0900df821bdcb5923fdc.pdf. (In Russ.).
13. Marchenko, O.V., Solomin, S.V. (2018). Kompleksnoe ispolzovanie vozobnovliaemykh istochnikov energii raznykh tipov dlia sovmestnogo proizvodstva elektrichestva i tepla (Integrated use of renewable energy sources of different types for combined heat and electricity production). Promyshlennaia Energetika (Industrial Power Engineering), No. 5, 52–57. (In Russ.).
14. Panepinto, D., Zanetti, M.C., Gitelman, L., Kozhevnikov, M., Magaril, E., Magaril, R. (2017). Energy from Biomass for Sustainable Cities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 72, Issue 1, 012021. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/72/1/012021.
15. Rada, E.C., Costa, L., Pradella, C., Adami, L., Schiavon, M., Magaril, E., Torretta, V. (2019). Unconventional small-scale biogas production with reduced local impact. International Journal of Energy Production and Management, Vol. 4, Issue 3, 198–208. DOI: 10.2495/EQ-V4-N3-198-208.
16. Argunova, M.V. (2016). Model «Umnogo» goroda kak proiavlenie novogo tekhnologicheskogo uklada (The „Smart City’’ model as a manifestation of the new technological mode). Nauka i shkola (Science and School), No. 3, 14–23. (In Russ.).
17. Karaeva, A., Magaril, E., Al-Kayiem, H., Torretta, V., Rada, E.C. (2021). Approaches to the assessment of ecological and economic efficiency of investment projects: Brief review and recommendations for improvements. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 253, 515–525. DOI: 10.2495/SC210421.
18. Lijó, L., Lorenzo-Toja, Y., González-García, S., Bacenetti, J., Negri, M., Moreira, M.T. (2017). Eco-efficiency assessment of farm-scaled biogas plants. Bioresource Technology, Vol. 237, 146–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.055.
19. Lansche, J., Muller, J. (2012). Life cycle assessment of energy generation of biogas fed combined heat and power plants: Environmental impact of different agricultural substrates. Engineering in Life Sciences, Vol. 12, Issue 3, 313–320 DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201100061.
20. Sun, C., Fu, Q., Liao, Q., Xia, A., Huang, Y., Zhu, X., Reungsang, A., Chang, H.-X. (2019). Life-cycle assessment of biofuel production from microalgae via various bioenergy conversion systems. Energy, Vol. 171, 1033–1045. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.074.
21. Morosuk, T., Tsatsaronis, G., Koroneos, C. (2016). Environmental impact reduction using exergy-based methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 118, 118–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.064.
22. Joshi, S. (1999). Product environmental life cycle assessment using input output techniques. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 3, Issue 2-3, 95–120. DOI: 10.1162/108819899569449.
23. Martín-Gamboa, M., Iribarren, D., García-Gusano, D., Dufour, J. (2017). A review of life-cycle approaches coupled with data envelopment analysis within multi-criteria decision analysis for sustainability assessment of energy systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 150, 164–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.017.
24. Iribarren, D., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G. (2010). Further potentials in the joint implementation of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 408, 5265–5272. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.078.
25. Madlener, R., Antunes, C.H., Dias, L.C. (2009). Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 197, Issue 3, 1084–1094. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.051.
26. Roos, A., Ahlgren, S. (2018). Consequential life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems – A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 189, 358–373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.233.
27. Escobar, N., Ribal, J., Clemente, G., Sanjuán, N. (2014). Consequential LCA of two alternative systems for biodiesel consumption in Spain, considering uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 79, 61–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.065.
28. Pehme, S., Veromann, E. (2015). Environmental consequences of anaerobic digestion of manure with different co-substrates to produce bioenergy: A review of life cycle assessments. Agronomy Research, Vol. 13, Issue 2, 372–381.
29. Cherubini, F., Strømman, A.H. (2011). Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: State of the art and future challenges. Bioresource Technology, Vol. 102, 437–451. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.010.
30. Kurka, T. (2013). Application of the analytic hierarchy process to evaluate the regional sustainability of bioenergy developments. Energy, Vol. 62, 393–402. DOI: 1016/j.energy.2013.09.053.
31. Aghbashlo, M., Khounani, Z., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Gupta, V.K., Amiri, H., Lam, S.S., Morosuk, T., Tabatabaei, M. (2021). Exergoenvironmental analysis of bioenergy systems: A comprehensive review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 149, 111399. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111399.
32. Maes, D., Passel, S. (2014). Advantages and limitations of exergy indicators to assess sustainability of bioenergy and biobased materials. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 45, 19–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.11.002.
33. Soltanian, S., Aghbashlo, M., Almasi, F., Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Nizami, A.-Z., Ok, Y.S., Lam, S.S., Tabatabaei, M. (2020). A critical review of the effects of pretreatment methods on the exergetic aspects of lignocellulosic biofuels. Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 212, 112792. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112792.
34. Muench, S., Guenther, E. (2013). A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments. Applied Energy, Vol. 112, 257–273. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.001
35. Hennig, C., Gawor, M. (2012). Bioenergy production and use: comparative analysis of the economic and environmental effects. Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 63, 130–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.03.031.
36. Whiting, A., Azapagic, A. (2014). Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion. Energy, Vol. 70, 181–193. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.103.
37. Padilla-Rivera, A., Paredes, G.M., Güereca, L.P. (2019). A systematic review of the sustainability assessment of bioenergy: The case of gaseous biofuels. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 125, 79–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.03.014.
38. Lobovikov, A.O., Abbazova, Zh.T., Solovyeva, E.V. (2015). Ekologo-ekonomicheskaia otsenka effektivnosti proekta primeneniia biogazovykh ustanovok [Ecological and economic assessment of a biogas plant project]. Aktualnye problemy ekonomiki i upravleniia na predpriiatiiakh mashinostroeniia, neftianoi i gazovoi promyshlennosti v usloviiakh innovatsionno-orientirovannoi ekonomiki [Current issues of economics and management at machine building and oil and gas companies in an innovation-driven economy], Vol. 1, 404–411. (In Russ.).
39. Fthenakis, V., Kim, H.C. (2009). Land use and electricity generation: A life-cycle analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, 1465–1474. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.017.
40. Maxim, A. (2013). Sustainability assessment of electricity generation technologies using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis. Energy Policy, Vol. 65, 284–297. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.09.059.
41. Mekonnen, M.M., Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 15, Issue 5, 1577–1600. DOI: 10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011.
42. Rodkin, O.I. (2013). Ekologicheskaia otsenka i potentsial ispolzovaniia solomy zernovykh kultur v kachestve biotopliva (Environmental and potential assessment of straw of cereal crops using as a biofuel). Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriia: Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment (Scientific journal NRU ITMO Series "Economics and Environmental Management), No. 3, 15. (In Russ.).
43. Hijazi, O., Munro, S., Zerhusen, B., Effenberger, M. (2016). Review of life cycle assessment for biogas production in Europe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 54, 1291–1300. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.013.
44. Buchholz, T., Luzadis, V.A., Volk, T.A. (2019). Sustainability criteria for bioenergy systems: results from an expert survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 17, S86–S98. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.04.015.
45. Wu, X., Wu, F., Tong, X., Wu, J., Sun, L., Peng, X. (2015). Emergy and greenhouse gas assessment of a sustainable, integrated agricultural model (SIAM) for plant, animal and biogas production: Analysis of the ecological recycle of wastes, Resources. Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 96, 40–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.01.010.
46. Khishtandar, S., Zandieh, M., Dorri, B. (2017). A multi criteria decision making framework for sustainability assessment of bioenergy production technologies with hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets: The case of Iran. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 77, 1130–1145. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.212.
47. Afgan, N.H., Carvalho, M.G., Hovanov, N.V. (2000). Energy system assessment with sustainability indicators. Energy Policy, Vol. 28, 603–612 DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00045-8.
48. Chong, Y.T., Teo, K.M., Tang, L.C. (2016). A lifecycle-based sustainability indicator framework for waste-to-energy systems and a proposed metric of sustainability. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 56, 797–809. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.036.
49. Rovere, E.L., Soares, J.B., Oliveira, L.B., Lauria, T. (2010). Sustainable expansion of electricity sector: sustainability indicators as an instrument to support decision making. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 14, Issue 1, 422–429. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.033.
50. Potting, J., Hekkert, M., Worrell, E., Hanemaaijeret, A. (2017). Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 46 р.
51. Valko, D.V. (2019). Tsirkuliarnaia ekonomika: poniatiinyi apparat i diffuziia kontseptsii v otechestvennykh issledovaniiakh (Circular economy: definitions and diffusion of the concept in Russian research). Nauchnyi zhurnal NIU ITMO. Seriia Ekonomika i ekologicheskii menedzhment (Scientific journal NRU ITMO Series "Economics and Environmental Management"), No. 2, 42–49. (In Russ.).
52. Gitelman, L.D., Ratnikov, B.E., Semerikov, A.S., Semerikov, M.A. (2006). Regionalnaia elektroenergetika. Protivokrizisnaia kontseptsiia [Region power engineering. An anti-crisis concept]. Moscow, Delo. (In Russ.).
53. Solomin, V.A. (2017). Perekhod na vozobnovliaemye istochniki energii kak politicheskaia zadacha [A transition to renewable energy sources as a political task]. Nezavisimaia gazeta. 01.10.2017. Available at: www.ng.ru/ng_energiya/2017-01-10/11_6897_sources.html. (In Russ.).
54. Huertas, J.I., Giraldo, N., Izquierdo, S. (2011). Removal of H2S and CO2 from Biogas by Amine Absorption. In: Mass Transfer in Chemical Engineering Processes. Edited by J. Markoš. IntechOpen, 133–150. DOI: 10.5772/20039.
55. J. Markoš (eds) (2011). Mass Transfer in Chemical Engineering Processes. IntechOpen, 320 р. DOI: 10.5772/659.
56. Chen, X.Y., Vinh-Thang, H., Ramirez, A.A., Rodrigue, D., Kaliaguine, S. (2015). Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading. RSC Advances, Vol. 5, 24399–24448. DOI: 10.1039/C5RA00666J.
57. Komina, G.P., Sauts, A.V. (2017). Poluchenie i ispolzovanie biogaza v reshenii zadach energosberezheniia i ekologicheskoi bezopasnosti [Production and use of biogas for energy conservation and environmental safety]. St Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. (In Russ.).
58. Cuellar, A.D., Webber, M.E. (2008). Cow power: the energy and emissions benefits of converting manure to biogas. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 3, Issue 3, 034002. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034002.
59. Kolganov, D. Iavliaetsia li utilizatsiia svalochnogo gaza rentabelnym proektom SO? [Is landfill gas utilization a profitable CO project?]. Rusdem-Energoeffekt. 2007-2010. Available at: www.methanetomarkets.ru/goods/mater13. (In Russ.).
60. Antushevich, A.A., Minakova, P.S., Ziazia, A.V., Poddubnyi, A.M. (2020). Otsenka energeticheskogo potentsiala poligona tverdykh kommunalnykh otkhodov (The assessment of energy capacity of the municipal solid waste landfill). Voprosy bezopasnosti (Security Issues), No. 5. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7543.2020.5.34738. (In Russ.).
61. Kiselev, A., Magaril, E., Magaril, R., Panepinto, D., Ravina, M., Zanetti, M.C. (2019). Towards circular economy: evaluation of sewage sludge biogas solutions. Resources, Vol. 8, Issue 2, 91. DOI: 10.3390/resources8020091.
62. Kravchenko, M., Pigosso, D., McAloone, T. (2019). Towards the ex-ante sustainability screening of circular economy initiatives in manufacturing companies: Consolidation of leading sustainability-related performance indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 241, 118318. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118318.
63. Bakker, C., den Hollander, M., van Hinte, E., Zijlstra, Y. (2014). Products that Last: Product Design for Circular Business Models. TU Delft Library, 112 р.
64. Bocken, N.M.P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, Vol. 33, 308–320. DOI: 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124.
65. Lieder, M., Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 115, 36–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042.
66. Parkinson, H.J., Thompson, G. (2003). Analysis and taxonomy of remanufacturing industry practice. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 217, 243–256. DOI: 10.1243/095440803322328890.
67. Thierry, M., Salomon, M., Van Nunen, J. (1995). Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review, Vol. 37. DOI: 10.1016/0024-6301(95)91628-8.
68. Allwood, J.M., Ashby, M.F., Gutowski, T.G., Worrell, E. (2011). Material efficiency: A white paper. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55, 362–381. DOI: 10.1016/jresconrec.2010.11.002.
69. Reike, D., Vermeulen, W.J.V., Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: new or refurbished as CE 3.0? – exploring controversies in the conceptualization of the circular economy through a focus on history and resource value retention options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 135, 246–264. DOI: 10.1016/jresconrec.2017.08.027.
70. Gitelman, L.D., Ratnikov, B.E. (2006). Energeticheskii biznes [Energy Business]. Moscow, Delo. (In Russ.).
71. Gitelman, L.D, Ratnikov, B.E. (2013). Ekonomika i biznes v elektroenergetike [The economics and business of power engineering]. Moscow, Ekonomika. (In Russ.).
72. Maisiuk, E.P. (2017). Printsipy i metody otsenki effektivnosti prirodookhrannykh meropriiatii v energetike (Principles and methods used for performance evaluation of environmental measures in power industry). Energetika i klimat (Energy and Climate)], No. 4, 92–98. (In Russ.).
73. Chebotareva, G.S., Dvinianinov, A.A. (2021). Ekonomicheskaia alternativa zameny tsentralizovannogo gazosnabzheniia avtonomnymi biogazovymi ustanovkami v gorodakh Rossii (An Economic Alternative to Replacing Centralized Gas Supply with Autonomous Biogas Facilities in Russian Cities). Journal of Applied Economic Research. Vol. 20, No. 3, 582–612. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.3.023. (In Russ.).
74. Karaeva, A.P., Magaril, E.R. (2020). Pokazateli prirodoemkosti proizvodstva energii kak instrument otsenki effektivnosti proektov v energetike (Environmental Capacity Indicators as a Tool for Evaluation of Energy Projects Efficiency). Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, 166–179. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.2.009. (In Russ.).
Acknowledgements
The research was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 22-28-01740, rscf.ru/en/project/22-28-01740/.
About Authors
Elena Romenovna Magaril
Doctor in Engineering, Professor, Head of Department of Environmental Economics, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID 0000-0003-3034-9978; e-mail: magaril67@mail.ru.
Leonid Davidovich Gitelman
Doctor in Economics, Professor, Head of Department of Energy Industry and Enterprise Management Systems, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID 0000-0002-5943-7659;e-mail: ldgitelman@gmail.com.
Anzhelika Pirmamedovna Karaeva
Post-Graduate Student, Department of Environmental Economics, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID 0000-0003-3367-7678; e-mail: anzhelika.karaeva@gmail.com.
Andrey Vladimirovich Kiselev
Post-Graduate Student, Junior Research Fellow, Department of Environmental Economics, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID 0000-0002-4199-2582; e-mail: ipkiselyov@mail.ru.
Mikhail Viktorovich Kozhevnikov
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Energy Industry and Enterprise Management Systems, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID 0000-0003-4463-5625; e-mail: m.v.kozhevnikov@urfu.ru.
For citation
Magaril E.R., Gitelman L.D., Karaeva A.P., Kiselev A.V., Kozhevnikov M.V. Methodological Approach to the Environmental and Economic Assessment of Biogas Energy Projects. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2022, Vol. 21, No. 2, 217-256. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.2.009.
Article info
Received February 26, 2022; Revised April 8, 2022; Accepted May 5, 2022.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.2.009
Download full text article:
~4 MB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
03.07.2022)
Created / Updated: 2 September 2015 / 20 September 2021
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
Contact us
Rector's Office
Rector, Dr. Victor Koksharov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-45-03, e-mail: rector@urfu.ru
Vice-Rector for International Relations, Dr. Maxim Khomyakov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-46-27, e-mail: Maksim.Khomyakov@urfu.ru