Journal of Applied Economic Research
ISSN 2712-7435
The Role of People’s Self-Interests of the Arctic Zone of Russia in Their Pro-environmental Behavior Choices
Valentina V. Karginova-Gubinova, Sergey V. Tishkov, Alexander D. Volkov
Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre, RAS, Petrozavodsk, Russia
Abstract
As environmental behavior is still uncommon in developing countries and needs to be popularized, research on the factors for engaging in certain green practices is of high relevance. The aim of this study is to determine how self-interests of individuals of the Arctic zone of Russia influence the pro-environmental behaviors they choose to fulfill. The main hypothesis of the study is that worse-off individuals are more orientated towards the green practices that meet their economic self-interests; individuals with a higher standard of living are more concerned with reinforcement of self-esteem and acknowledgment from society. Methodologically, the study relied on Maslow’s needs theory and the Campbell paradigm. The dataset was gathered by surveying 1,102 residents of the Arctic zone of the Republic of Karelia on 14 green practices they may use. The data were analyzed by expert assessment, descriptive statistics methods, analysis of variance, correlation and cluster analyses. The study showed that the level of environmental concern of individuals does not depend on their standards of living, but as this involves financial costs; worse-off individuals adhere to fewer green practices and are more likely to choose the less costly ones (with no correlation between the income and the positive economic effect from the practice). At the same time, the green practices of environmentally passive and environmentally active individuals are less suited to their economic interests than the practices of individuals with a medium level of environmental activity. Scientifically, the value of this study is that it specifies and complements Maslow’s needs theory and the Campbell paradigm. The findings are of interest for authorities and non-governmental organizations in their efforts to alter the institutional arrangements for unpopular practices.
Keywords
Arctic zone of Karelia; green practices; economic interests; environmental interests; pro-environmental actions
JEL classification
O13, Q56, D03References
1. Hadler, M., Haller, M. (2011). Global Activism and Nationally Driven Recycling: The Influence of World Society and National Contexts on Public and Private Environmental Behavior. International Sociology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 315–345. DOI: 10.1177/0268580910392258.
2. Karginova-Gubinova, V., Volkov, A., Tishkov, S., Shcherbak, A. (2021). The Impact of Economic Interests on Eco-Consumption: The Case of the Russian Arctic Zone of Karelia. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, Vol. 8, No. 4, 68–84. DOI: 10.9770/jesi.2021.8.4(4).
3. Pedro, Á.S., Pedro, V.M. (2010). Developing Sustainable Environmental Behavior in Secondary Education Students (12-16) Analysis of a Didactic Strategy. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 3568–3574. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.553.
4. Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and Personality. New York, Harper and Row.
5. van Kempen, L., Muradian, R., Sandóval, C., Castañeda, J.-P. (2009). Too Poor to Be Green Consumers? A Field Experiment on Revealed Preferences for Firewood in Rural Guatemala. Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 7, 2160–2167. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.014.
6. Diekmann, A., Franzen, A. (1999). The Wealth of Nations and Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 4, 540–549. DOI: 10.1177/00139169921972227.
7. Seeley, E. (1992). Human Needs and Consumer Economics: The Implications of Maslow’s Theory of Motivation for Consumer Expenditure Patterns. The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 21, Issue 4, 303–324. DOI: 10.1016/1053-5357(92)90002-O.
8. Li, J., Zhou, Y., Yu, D., Liu, C. (2020). Consumers’ Purchase Intention of New Energy Vehicles: Do Product-Life-Cycle Policy Portfolios Matter? Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 5, 1711. DOI: 10.3390/su12051711.
9. Huang, X., Ge, J. (2019). Electric Vehicle Development in Beijing: An Analysis of Consumer Purchase Intention. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 216, 361–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.231.
10. Lee, E.-Y., Khan, A. (2020). Prevalence and Clustering Patterns of Pro-Environmental Behaviors among Canadian Households in the Era of Climate Change. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 19, 8218. DOI: 10.3390/su12198218.
11. Tilikidou, I., Delistavrou, A. (2004). The Influence of the Materialistic Values on Consumers’ Pro-Environmental Post-Purchase Behavior. In: Marketing Theory and Applications, Proceedings of the 2004 American Marketing Association Winter Educators’ Conference. Edited by W.L. Cron, G.S. Low (Eds.). Chicago, A.M.A, Vol. 15, 42–49.
12. Cui, L., Wang, Y., Chen, W., Wen, W., Han, M.S. (2021). Predicting Determinants of Consumers’ Purchase Motivation for Electric Vehicles: An Application of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Model. Energy Policy, Vol. 151, 112167. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112167.
13. Gąsior, M. (2021). Environmental Attitudes and Willingness to Purchase Online – Classification Approach. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 15, 8592. DOI: 10.3390/su13158592.
14. Bodur, M., Sarigöllü, E. (2005). Environmental Sensitivity in a Developing Country: Consumer Classification and Implications. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 37, No. 4, 487–510. DOI: 10.1177/0013916504269666.
15. Dresner, M., Handelman, C., Braun, S., Rollwagen-Bollens, G. (2015). Environmental Identity, pro-Environmental Behaviors, and Civic Engagement of Volunteer Stewards in Portland Area Parks. Environmental Education Research, Vol. 21, Issue 7, 991–1010. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2014.964188.
16. Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., Wiedmann, K.-P., Weber, A. (2018). The Many Faces ofSustainability-ConsciousConsumers: A Category-Independent Typology. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 91, 83–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.05.022.
17. Koszewska, M.A. (2013). Typology of Polish Consumers and Their Behaviours in the Market for Sustainable Textiles and Clothing. International Journal of Consumer Studies, Vol. 37, Issue 5, 507–521. DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12031.
18. Maciejewski, G., Mokrysz, S., Wróblewski, Ł. (2019). Segmentation of Coffee Consumers Using Sustainable Values: Cluster Analysis on the Polish Coffee Market. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 3, 613. DOI: 10.3390/su11030613.
19. Risius, A., Hamm, U., Janssen, M. (2019). Target Groups for Fish from Aquaculture: Consumer Segmentation Based on Sustainability Attributes and Country of Origin. Aquaculture, Vol. 499, 341–347. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.09.044.
20. Peštek, A., Agic, E., &Cinjarevic, M. (2018). Segmentation of Organic Food Buyers: An Emergent Market Perspective. British Food Journal, Vol. 120, No. 2, 269–289. DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-04-2017-0215.
21. Elgaaied, L. (2012). Exploring the Role of Anticipated Guilt on Pro-environmental Behavior – a Suggested Typology of Residents in France Based on Their Recycling Patterns. Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 29, No. 5, 369–377. DOI: 10.1108/07363761211247488.
22. Mohr, L.A., Webb, D.J., Harris, K.E. (2001). Do Consumers Expect Companies to Be Socially Responsible? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Buying Behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, Vol. 35, No. 1, 45–72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6606.2001.tb00102.x.
23. Andreasen, A.R. (2002). Marketing Social Marketing in the Social Change Marketplace. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, Vol. 21, No. 1, 3–13. DOI: 10.1509/jppm.21.1.3.17602.
24. Yoon, T.K., Ahn, S. (2020). Clustering Koreans’ Environmental Awareness and Attitudes into Seven Groups: Environmentalists, Dissatisfieds, Inactivators, Bystanders, Honeybees, Optimists, and Moderates. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 20, 8370. DOI: 10.3390/su12208370.
25. Groening, C., Sarkis, J., Zhu, Q. (2018). Green Marketing Consumer-Level Theory Review: A Compendium of Applied Theories and Further Research Directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 172, 1848–1866. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.002.
26. Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L. (1993). Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 25, No. 5, 322–348. DOI: 10.1177/0013916593255002.
27. Gatersleben, B., Murtagh, N., Abrahamse, W. (2014). Values, Identity and pro-Environmental Behaviour. Contemporary Social Science, Vol. 9, Issue 4, 374–392. DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.682086.
28. Tabernero, C., Hernández, B. (2011). Self-Efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation Guiding Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 43, No. 5, 658–675. DOI: 10.1177/0013916510379759.
29. Abraham, J., Pane, M.M., Chairiyani, R.P. (2015). An Investigation on Cynicism and Environmental Self-Efficacy as Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behavior. Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 234–242. DOI: 10.4236/psych.2015.63023.
30. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
31. Liu, H.T., Tsaur, R.-C. (2020). The Theory of Reasoned Action Applied to Green Smartphones: Moderating Effect of Government Subsidies. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 15, 5979. DOI: 10.3390/su12155979.
32. Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Edited by J. Kuhl, J. Beckmann. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 11–39.
33. Lucarelli, C., Mazzoli, C., Severini, S. (2020). Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior to Examine Pro-Environmental Behavior: The Moderating Effect of COVID-19 Beliefs. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 24, 10556. DOI: 10.3390/su122410556.
34. Stern, P.C. (1999). Information, Incentives, and Proenvironmental Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Policy, Vol. 22, 461–478. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006211709570.
35. Hiratsuka, J., Perlaviciute, G., Steg, L. (2018). Testing VBN Theory in Japan: Relationships between Values, Beliefs, Norms, and Acceptability and Expected Effects of a Car Pricing Policy. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 53, 74–83. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.12.015.
36. Hwang, J., Kim, W., Kim, J.J. (2020). Application of the Value-Belief-Norm Model to Environmentally Friendly Drone Food Delivery Services: The Moderating Role of Product Involvement. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 32, No. 5, 1775–1794. DOI: 10.1108/IJCHM-08-2019-0710.
37. Wu, J. (Snow), Font, X., Liu, J. (2021). The Elusive Impact of Pro-Environmental Intention on Holiday on pro-Environmental Behaviour at Home. Tourism Management, Vol. 85, 104283. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104283.
38. Lynne, G.D. (2006). Toward a Dual Motive Metaeconomic Theory. The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 634–651. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2005.12.019.
39. Hayes, W.M., Lynne, G.D. (2004). Towards a Centerpiece for Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics, Vol. 49, Issue 3, 287–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.01.014.
40. Kalinowski, C.M., Lynne, G.D., Johnson, B. (2006). Recycling as a Reflection of Balanced Self-Interest: A Test of the Metaeconomics Approach. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 38, No. 3, 333–355. DOI: 10.1177/0013916505279043.
41. Ewing, G. (2001). Altruistic, Egoistic, and Normative Effects on Curbside Recycling. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 33, No. 6, 733–764. DOI: 10.1177/00139160121973223.
42. Kaiser, F.G., Byrka, K., Hartig, T. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s Paradigm for Attitude Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 351–367. DOI: 10.1177/1088868310366452.
43. Liobikienė, G., &Minelgaitė, A. (2021). Energy and Resource-Saving Behaviours in European Union Countries: The Campbell Paradigm and Goal Framing Theory Approaches. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 750, 141745. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141745.
44. Kaiser, F.G., Lange, F. (2021). Offsetting Behavioral Costs with Personal Attitude: Identifying the Psychological Essence of an Environmental Attitude Measure. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 75, 101619. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101619.
45. Maslow, A. (1973). The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. Harmondsworth, Penguin.
46. Doyal, L., Gough, I. (1984). A Theory of Human Needs. Critical Social Policy, Vol. 4, No. 10, 6–38. DOI: 10.1177/026101838400401002.
47. Max-Neef, M.A., Elizalde, A., Hopenhayn, M. (1991). Human Scale Development: Conception, Application and Further Reflections. New York, The Apex Press.
48. Pincus, J. (2004). The Consequences of Unmet Needs: The Evolving Role of Motivation in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 3, Issue 4, 375–387. DOI: 10.1002/cb.149.
49. Amine, L.S. (2003). An Integrated Micro- and Macrolevel Discussion of Global Green Issues: “It Isn’t Easy Being Green.” Journal of International Management, Vol. 9, Issue 4, 373–393. DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2003.08.002.
50. Green, T., Peloza, J. (2014). Finding the Right Shade of Green: The Effect of Advertising Appeal Type on Environmentally Friendly Consumption. Journal of Advertising, Vol. 43, Issue 2, 128–141. DOI: 10.1080/00913367.2013.834805.
51. Hamilton, L.A. (2003). The Political Philosophy of Needs. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
52. Hagerty, M.R. (1999). Testing Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: National Quality-of-Life Across Time. Social Indicators Research, Vol. 46, 249–271. DOI: 10.1023/A:1006921107298.
53. Wong, T.K., Wan, P. (2011). Perceptions and Determinants of Environmental Concern: The Case of Hong Kong and Its Implications for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, Vol. 19, Issue 4, 235–249. DOI: 10.1002/sd.429.
54. Olofsson, A., &Öhman, S. (2006). General Beliefs and Environmental Concern: Transatlantic Comparisons. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 38, No. 6, 768–790. DOI: 10.1177/0013916506287388.
55. Gao, Y.L., Mattila, A.S. (2016). The Impact of Option Popularity, Social Inclusion/Exclusion, and Self-Affirmation on Consumers’ Propensity to Choose Green Hotels. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 136, 575–585. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2536-6.
56. Ramayah, T., Lee, J.W.C., Mohamad, O. (2010). Green Product Purchase Intention: Some Insights from a Developing Country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 54, Issue 12, 1419–1427. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.007.
57. Escobar-Sierra, M., García-Cardona, A., Vera Acevedo, L.D. (2021). How Moral Outrage Affects Consumer’s Perceived Values of Socially Irresponsible Companies. Cogent Business & Management, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 1888668. DOI: 10.1080/23311975.2021.1888668.
58. Clark, R.A., Haytko, D.L., Hermans, C.M., Simmers, C.S. (2019). Social Influence on Green Consumerism: Country and Gender Comparisons between China and the United States. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 31, Issue 3, 177–190. DOI: 10.1080/08961530.2018.1527740.
59. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J.M., Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going Green to Be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 98, No. 3, 392–404. DOI: doi.apa.org/doiLanding.
60. Kryanev, A.V., Semenov, S.S. (2013). On the Issue of Quality and Reliability of Expert Judgments in Determining the Engineering Level of Complex Systems. Dependability, Vol. 4, 90–109. DOI: 10.21683/1729-2646-2013-0-4-90-109.
61. Huber, M., Rembiałkowska, E., Średnicka, D., Bügel, S., van de Vijver, L.P.L. (2011). Organic Food and Impact on Human Health: Assessing the Status Quo and Prospects of Research. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, Vol. 58, Issue 3–4, 103–109. DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2011.01.004.
62. van de Vijver, L.P., van Vliet, M.E. (2012). Health Effects of an Organic Diet – Consumer Experiences in the Netherlands. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Vol. 92, Issue 14, 2923–2927. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5614.
Acknowledgements
The reported study was funded by RFBR, project number 20-010-00245 А.
About Authors
Valentina Vladimirovna Karginova-Gubinova
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Researcher, Department of Regional Economic Policy, Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Russia (185030, Republic of Karelia, Petrozavodsk, Al. Nevsky Prospect, 50); ORCID 0000-0002-5125-3388; e-mail: vkarginowa@yandex.ru.
Sergey Vyacheslavovich Tishkov
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Scientific Secretary, Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Russia (185030, Republic of Karelia, Petrozavodsk, Al. Nevsky Prospect, 50); ORCID 0000-0002-6061-4165; e-mail: insteco_85@mail.ru.
Alexander Dmitrievich Volkov
Junior Researcher, Department of Regional Institutional Development Institute of Economics, Institute of Economics, Karelian Research Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Petrozavodsk, Russia (185030, Republic of Karelia, Petrozavodsk, Al. Nevsky Prospect, 50); ORCID 0000-0003-0451-8483; e-mail: kov8vol@gmail.com.
For citation
Karginova-Gubinova V.V., Tishkov S.V., Volkov A.D. The Role of People’s Self-Interests of the Arctic Zone of Russia in Their Pro-environmental Behavior Choices. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2022, Vol. 21, No. 2, 365-389. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.2.013.
Article info
Received March 3, 2022; Revised April 25, 2022; Accepted May 20, 2022.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.2.013
Download full text article:
~1 MB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
03.07.2022)
Created / Updated: 2 September 2015 / 20 September 2021
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
Contact us
Rector's Office
Rector, Dr. Victor Koksharov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-45-03, e-mail: rector@urfu.ru
Vice-Rector for International Relations, Dr. Maxim Khomyakov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-46-27, e-mail: Maksim.Khomyakov@urfu.ru