Journal of Applied Economic Research
ISSN 2712-7435
Strategic Individualization of Scientific and Technical Development of the Economy of Industrial Regions of Russia Taking into Account their Hereditary Determinants
Yuliya G. Myslyakova
Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia
Abstract
Developing an effective strategy for the scientific and technological development of the national economy is a difficult task, especially for the Russian Federation that is known for its interregional distortions. Therefore, the innovation path of each industrial region should be individualized, the territorial predisposition to the development should be taken into account and technological solutions should be launched, which will make it possible to form effective mechanisms of institutional support for the innovation activity of specific territories. The scientific hypothesis of the study is that the hereditary determinants of the industrial region determine the individual features of the strategy of scientific and technological development. The purpose of the study is to develop a methodological approach to the individualization of regional strategies for the scientific and technological development of the industrial economy, taking into account hereditary determinants responsible for the innovative predisposition of the territories. To achieve the goal, the theoretical and methodological features of the individualization of strategies related to the target guideline were clarified, including targeted programs that take into account the historically established features of the territories; stages, and the strategy for the development of the national economy was added to the general scheme. The methodological basis of the author's strategic individualization is the Markov chain construction toolkit, which allows one to determine the innovative differentiation of regions on the basis of the identification of mutations in production, social and institutional determinants,. The testing of the tools made it possible to establish that industrial regions have a hereditary predisposition to scientific and technological development. The strategies of the regions of the North-Western Federal District, the Volga Federal District and the Ural Federal District should stimulate accelerated innovation, and the regions of the Southern Federal District, the Siberian Federal District and the Central Federal District to ensure smooth innovation of the industrial economy. The article also defines the place of the process of individualization of regional strategies in the general concept of achieving basic priorities for the scientific and technological development of the national economy, which ensures the formation of a new innovation policy of the country. The theoretical significance of the study lies in the development of an evolutionary-genetic approach to the development of strategies for the scientific and technological development of industrial regions, expanding the understanding of their individualization in the context of accounting for hereditary determinants responsible for the innovative predisposition of territories. The applied significance of the scientific results of the study consists in expanding the assessment mechanisms used by state and regional authorities in the development of strategic documents of scientific and technological development and their improvement.
Keywords
individualization of strategies; scientific and technological development; economy of industrial regions; innovative differentiation; predisposition of the territory; hereditary determinants.
JEL classification
R11References
1. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No. 3, 483–499. DOI: 10.1086/261763.
2. Alonso, J.C. (2004). La psicologíaanalítica de jung y sus aportes a la psicoterapia. Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Vol. 3, No. 1. Pp. 55–70. Available at: www.redalyc.org/pdf/647/64730107.pdf.
3. Jung, C.G. (1985). Psicología y Educación. Barcelona: Editorial Paidó, 1985. 101 p.
4. Fromm, E. (1994). Escape from Freedom. Holt Paperbacks.
5. Druzhinin, V.N. (2000). Varianty zhizni. Ocherki ekzistentsial'noi psikhologii [Variants of life. Essays on existential psychology]. St Petersburg. IMATON-M. Available at: www.litres.ru/vladimir-druzhinin/varianty-zhizni-ocherki-ekzistencialnoy-psihologii/chitat-onlayn/. (In Russ.).
6. Kirsanov, A.A. (1983). Individualizatsiia uchebnoi deiatelnosti kak pedagogicheskaia problema [Individualization of learning as a pedagogical problem]. Kazan, Kazan University. (In Russ.).
7. Miroshkina, M.R. (2008). Individualizatsiia kak predmet nauchnykh issledovanii [Individualization as a research subject]. Kazanskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal (Kazan Pedagogical Journal), No. 3, 29–34. URL: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_12225288_57993447.pdf. (In Russ.).
8. Newstrom, K., Davis, J. (2002). Organizational Behavior: Human Behavior at Work. McGraw-Hill-Irwin.
9. Bochko, V.S. (2018). Raskhozhdenie vzgliadov K. Marksa i A. I. Gertsena na perspektivy ekonomicheskogo razvitiia Rossii. Znachenie dlia sovremennosti (Differences of Opinion between K. Marx and A. I. Herzen over the Prospects of Economic Development of Russia: Significance for the Present Time). Ekonomika regiona (Economy of the Region), Vol. 14, No. 3, 740–757. DOI: 10.17059/2018–3–5. (In Russ.).
10. Bochko, V.S., Zakharchuk, E.A. (2020). Individualizatsiia strategii razvitiia gorodov. Na primere Ekaterinburga i Birmingema (Individualization of city development strategies: Case of Ekaterinburg and Birmingham). Ekonomika regiona (Economy of the region), Vol. 16, No. 2, 391–405. DOI: 10.17059/2020-2-5. (In Russ.).
11. Rimashevskaia, N.M. (2004). Kachestvo chelovecheskogo potentsiala v sovremennoi Rossii [Quality of human potential in contemporary Russia]. Bezopasnost Evrazii [Security in Eurasia], No. 1 (15), 14‒32. Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_20362884_48446328.PDF. (In Russ.).
12. Isakin, M.A. (2005). Postroenie integralnykh indikatorov kachestva zhizni naseleniia regionov (Integral indicators of the quality of life of regional population). Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiia (Region: Economics and Sociology), No. 1, 92‒109. Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_9120892_75097787.pdf. (In Russ.).
13. Polynev, A.O. (2011). Mezhregionalnaia ekonomicheskaia differentsiatsiia: metodologiia analiza i gosudarstvennogo regulirovaniia [Interregional economic differentiation: A methodology of analysis and state regulation]. Moscow, Editorial URSS.
14. Kislitsyna, V.V., Cheglakova, L.S., Karaulov, V.M., Chikisheva, A.N. (2017). Formirovanie kompleksnogo podkhoda k otsenke sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia regionov (Formation of the integrated approach to the assessment of the socio-economic development of regions). Ekonomika regiona (Economy of the Region), Vol. 13, No. 2, 369–380. DOI: 10.17059/2017-2-4. (In Russ.).
15. Acharya, S., Morichi, S., Yoshida, T. (1999). Role of infrastructure investment in regional growth and dynamic simulation approach. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transporlation Studies, Vol. 3, No. 4, 39–54. Available at: www.easts.info/on-line/journal/vol3no4/34004.pdf.
16. Trotskovsky. A.Ia. (1997). Sotsialno-territorialnaia struktura regiona: stroenie i osnovnye tendentsii transformatsii [Socio-territorial structure of a region: The layout and key transformation trends]. Novosibirsk, Institute of Economics and Industrial Engineering, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.).
17. Belomestnov, V.G. (2003). Upravlenie razvitiem problemnykh territorialno-otraslevykh system [Managing the developing of problem-prone territorial and industrial systems]. Irkutsk, Baykal State University. (In Russ.).
18. Leonov, S.N. (2010) Problemy regionalizatsii sovremennoi rossiiskoi ekonomiki (Problems of regionalization in the contemporary economy of Russia). Initsiativy XXI v [Initiatives of the 21st century], No 1, 51‒54 (in Russ.).
19. Svetunkov, S.G., Zagranovskaia, A.V., Svetunkov, I.S. (2012). Kompleksnoznachnyi analiz i modelirovanie neravnomernosti sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitiia regionov Rossii [Complex valued analysis and modeling of unevenness in the socio-economic development of Russia's regions]. St Petersburg. Available at: sergey.svetunkov.ru/economics/complex/files/MD2012.pdf. (In Russ.).
20. Avramenko, Iu.S. (2014). Usloviia i faktory, vliiaiushchie na tselevye ustanovki innovatsionnogo razvitiia regiona (Conditions and the factors influencing purposes of innovative development of the region). Fundamentalnye issledovaniia (Fundamental Research), No. 6, 288–292. URL: fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view. (In Russ.).
21. Yaminsky, I. (2018). Idei i innovatsii, fabriki i zavody (Ideas and innovations, factories and plants). Nanoindustriia (Nano Industry), No. 1, 84–86. DOI: 10.22184/1993-8578.2018.80.1.84.86. (In Russ.).
22. Khmeleva, G.A. (2012). Chelovecheskii kapital kak uslovie formirovaniia innovatsionnoi ekonomiki regiona [Human capital as a condition for the formation of an innovation economy in a region]. Samara, SAGMU. (In Russ.).
23. Khasanova, M.A., Sadyrtdinov, R.R. (2012). Otsenka vliianiia chelovecheskogo kapitala na razvitie innovatsionnoi deiatelnosti v regionakh Privolzhskogo federalnogo okruga [Assessment of the influence of human capital on the development of the innovation sphere in the regions of the Volga Federal District]. Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta [Proceedings of Kazan University], Vol. 154, 32–41. Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_18772236_35192696.pdf. (In Russ.).
24. Davidson, N., Mariev, O., Pushkarev, A. (2018). The Impact of Externalities on the Innovation Activity of Russian Firms. Foresight and STI Governance, Vol. 12, No. 3, 62–72. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2018.3.62.72.
25. Solopan, I.E. (2014). Innovatsionnaia aktivnost' i faktory, ee opredeliaiushchie (Russian Federation Innovative Activities: The Factors that Influence Them). Ekonomika i upravlenie (Economics and Management), No. 8 (106), 104–108. Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_22005237_74700906.pdf. (In Russ.).
26. Ford C.M. (1996). A Theory of Individual Creative Action in Multiple Social Domains. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1112–1142. DOI: 10.2307/259166. (In Russ.).
27. Ivanova, O.P. (2010). Formirovanie innovatsionnoi regionalnoi sredy kak determinanty povysheniia konkurentosposobnosti predpriiatii [Formation of an innovative regional environment as the determining factor of improving the competitive ability of a company]. Problemy sovremennoi ekonomiki (Problems of Modern Economics), No. 2-2, 47–55. Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_20586415_77742745.pdf. (In Russ.).
28. Ermasova, N.B., Nikitin, A.A. (2014). Faktory, vliiaiushchie na innovatsionnuiu aktivnost organizatsii (Factors Influencing the Innovation Activity of Organizations). Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo [Economics. Management. Law], No. 3, 495–503. Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_22792665_99248483.pdf. (In Russ.).
29. Soboleva, O.S., Nogovitsyna, O.N. (2014). Klassifikatsiia faktorov innovatsionnoi aktivnosti khoziaistvuiushchikh subyektov regiona (Classification of factors of innovative activity of the leading territorial entities of the region). Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriia: Ekonomika (Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series Economics), No. 4, 69– 75. Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_22856575_22102486.pdf. (In Russ.).
30. Graham, E. (2022). Angel Investing Startups. In: Financing Startups: Understanding Strategic Risks, Funding Sources, and the Impact of Emerging Technologies. Edited by C. Lassala, S. Ribeiro-Navarrete. Springer, 21–29. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-94058-4_2.
31. Modigliani, F., Miller, M.H. (1958). The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. The American Economic Review, Vol. 48, No. 3, 261–297. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/1809766.
32. Benjamin, G., Margulis, J. (1999). Angel Financing: How to Find and Invest in Private Equity. Wiley, 336 p.
33. Myslyakova, Iu.G., Shamova, E.A., Nekliudova, N.P. (2020). Sotsialno-ekonomicheskii genotip territorii operezhaiushchego razvitiia (na primere uralskogo regiona) (Social and Economic Genotype of Territories of Advanced Development on Example of the Ural Region). Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 310–328. DOI:10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.3.015. (In Russ.).
34. Myslyakova, Yu.G. (2021). Osnovy ekonomicheskoi genetiki v modeliakh evoliutsii i revitalizatsii staropromyshlennykh regionov (Fundamentals of Economic Genetics in Models of Evolution and Revitalization of Old Industrial Regions). Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, 489–523. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.3.020. (In Russ.).
35. Khegai, S.A. (2008). Analiz regionalnoi differentsiatsii innovatsionnoi aktivnosti (Analysis of Regional Differentiation of Innovation Activity). Vestnik NGU. Seriia: Sotsialno-ekonomicheskie nauki (Vestnik NSU. Series: Socio-economic sciences), Vol. 8, No. 4, 127–136. Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_11654372_58730904.pdf. (In Russ.).
36. Osovin, M.N. (2020). Obosnovanie uslovii i faktorov snizheniia regional'noi differentsiatsii innovatsionnoi aktivnosti (Substantiation of conditions and factors for reducing regional differentiation of innovative activity). Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika (Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics), Vol. 2, No. 3, 65–76. DOI: 10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2020.3.6. (In Russ.).
37. Molchanov, I.N., Molchanova, N.P. (2014). Differentsiatsiia innovatsionnogo potentsiala regionov i gosudarstvennaia podderzhka innovatsionnogo razvitiia (na primere subyektov Yuzhnogo Federalnogo Okruga) (Differentiation of innovative capacity of regions and state support of innovative development (exeplified by the subjects of the Southern Federation District)). Voprosy upravleniia (Management Issues), No. 1, 74–83. (In Russ.).
38. Mikhalchenkov, N.V., Gusarova, O.M., Kiiashchenko, L.T. (2014). Differentsiatsiia regionov po urovniu ikh innovatsionnoi aktivnosti [Differentiation of regions by level of innovative activity]. Vestnik magistratury [Master's Journal], No. 10(37), 90–93. (In Russ.).
39. Arkhipova, M.Iu. (2006). Differentsiatsiia regionov Rossii po innovatsionnoi aktivnosti [Differentiation of Russia's regions by innovative activity]. Ekonomika, Statistika i Informatika (Statistics and Economics), No. 1, 37–44. Available at: www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_26342534_49116494.pdf. (In Russ.).
40. Afanasyev, M.Iu., Kudrov, A.V., Lysenkova, M.A. (2020). Sravnenie indeksov innovatsionnogo razvitiia v prostranstve kharakteristik regionalnoi differentsiatsii (Comparison of innovative development indexes in the space of regional differentiation characteristics). Vestnik VGUIT (Proceedings of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies), Vol. 82, No. 4, 340–346. DOI:10.20914/2310-1202-2020-4-340-346. (In Russ.).
Acknowledgements
The article was prepared with the financial support of the International Scientific Fund for Economic Research Academician N.P. Fedorenko. Draft No. 2020-129.
About Authors
Yuliya Gennadyevna Myslyakova
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Head of the Laboratory of Economic Genetics of the Regions, Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620014, Ekaterinburg, Moskovskaya street, 29); ORCID 0000-0001-7635-3601; e-mail: mysliakova.ug@uiec.ru.
For citation
Myslyakova Yu.G. Strategic Individualization of Scientific and Technical Development of the Economy of Industrial Regions of Russia Taking into Account their Hereditary Determinants. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2022, Vol. 21, No. 4, 685-707. DOI: 10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.4.024.
Article info
Received September 19, 2022; Revised October 5, 2022; Accepted October 25, 2022.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2022.21.4.024
Download full text article:
~566 KB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
10.12.2022)
Created / Updated: 2 September 2015 / 20 September 2021
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
Contact us
Rector's Office
Rector, Dr. Victor Koksharov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-45-03, e-mail: rector@urfu.ru
Vice-Rector for International Relations, Dr. Maxim Khomyakov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-46-27, e-mail: Maksim.Khomyakov@urfu.ru