Journal of Applied Economic Research
ISSN 2712-7435
Correlation Assessment of Environmental and Energy Features of Wastewater Treatment Plants Towards Circular Economy
Andrey V. Kiselev, Elena R. Magaril
Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia
Abstract
Wastewater treatment plays an important role in ensuring ecological safety for water bodies. The achievement of the standard quality of wastewater treatment is being fulfilled through the introduction of the best available techniques. However, the process of wastewater treatment and sludge utilization itself is quite energy intensive. In the course of investment program planning and implementation, corporate managers and local authorities often focus on individual tasks such as how to improve the wastewater treatment quality or to improve energy efficiency; these factors are, however, however interrelated. Achieving the standard quality of wastewater treatment through the introduction of best available techniques and an increase in the number of technological stages usually leads to an increase in the overall energy consumption of the facilities. The hypothesis of the research suggests that the performance assessment of wastewater treatment plants needs mutual accounting of two main factors: wastewater treatment quality and energy efficiency. The main purpose of this work is to develop a methodological approach for assessing the effectiveness of wastewater treatment plants on the way towards the implementation of circular economy principles, followed by its trial application. The authors proposed a methodological framework that consists of three stages: (1) assessing the quality of wastewater treatment, (2) assessing energy efficiency, and (3) constructing a sustainability index on a correlation matrix. The outputs of the operation activities of wastewater treatment plants in Yekaterinburg for 2015-2018 were used for methodological framework approbation. The results of the investigation develop existing knowledge regarding the assessment of the effectiveness of management at treatment facilities and confirm the research hypothesis: the obtained values of the sustainable index correlate with the technical condition of the facilities both in terms of the achievement of the standard treatment quality the energy efficiency of the technological process. The practical significance of the study lies in the creation of a convenient and simple management tool for assessing the current success of wastewater treatment plants and progress in implementing successful circular economy practices. The proposed approach can be used as an element of environmental and economic assessment in the energy sector.
Keywords
wastewater; sustainable management; circular economy; benchmark; energy.
JEL classification
Q56References
1. Ostoich, M., Serena, F., Zacchello, C., Falletti, L., Zambon, M., Tomiato, L. (2017). Discharge quality from municipal wastewater treatment plants and the Sludge Biotic Index for activated sludge: Integrative assessment. Water Practice and Technology, Vol. 12, Issue 4, 857–870. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2017.092
2. Huang, B., He, C., Fan, N., Jin, R., Yu, H. (2020). Envisaging wastewater-to-energy practices for sustainable urban water pollution control: Current achievements and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 134, 110134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110134
3. Mor, J., Dolédec, S., Acuña, V., Sabater, S., Muñoz, I. (2019). Invertebrate community responses to urban wastewater effluent pollution under different hydro-morphological conditions. Environmental Pollution, Vol. 252, Part A, 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.114
4. Zaborowska, E., Czerwionka, K., Makinia, J. (2017). Strategies for achieving energy neutrality in biological nutrient removal systems — a case study of the Slupsk WWTP (northern Poland). Water Science & Technology, Vol. 75, Issue 3, 727–740. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.564
5. Siatou, A., Manali, A., Gikas, P. (2020). Energy Consumption and Internal Distribution in Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plants of Greece. Water, Vol. 12, Issue 4, 1204. https://doi.org/10.3390/W12041204
6. Gurung, K., Tang, W., Sillanpää, M. (2018). Unit Energy Consumption as Benchmark to Select Energy Positive Retrofitting Strategies for Finnish Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs): A Case Study of Mikkeli WWTP. Environmental Processes, Vol. 5, 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-018-0310-y
7. Valenti, F., Toscano, A. (2021). A GIS-based Model to Assess the Potential of Wastewater Treatment Plants for Enhancing Bioenergy Production within the Context of Water-Energy Nexus. Energies, Vol. 14, Issue 10, 2838. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14102838
8. Borzooei, S., Campo, G., Cerutti, A., Meucci, L., Panepinto, D., Ravina, M., Riggio, V., Ruffino, B., Scibilia, G., Zanetti, M. (2020). Feasibility Analysis for Reduction of Carbon Footprint in a Wastewater Treatment Plant. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 271, 122526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122526
9. Shrestha, B., Hernandez, R., Fortela, D., Sharp, W., Chistoserdov, A., Gang, D., Revellame, E., Holmes, W., Zappi, M. (2020). A Review of Pretreatment Methods to Enhance Solids Reduction during Anaerobic Digestion of Municipal Wastewater Sludges and the Resulting Digester Performance: Implications to Future Urban Biorefineries. Applied Sciences, Vol. 10, Issue 24, 9141. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10249141
10. Fighir, D., Teodosiu, C., Fiore, S. (2019). Environmental and Energy Assessment of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants in Italy and Romania: A Comparative Study. Water, Vol. 11, Issue 8, 1611. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081611
11. Raghuvanshi, S., Bhakar, V., Sowmya, C., Sangwan, K.S. (2017). Waste Water Treatment Plant Life Cycle Assessment: Treatment Process to Reuse of Water. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 61, 761–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.170
12. Li, Y., Luo, X., Huang, X., Wang, D., Zhang, W. (2013). Life Cycle Assessment of a municipal wastewater treatment plant: A case study in Suzhou, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 57, 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.035
13. Rebello, T., Roque, R., Goncalves, R., Calmon, J., Queiroz, L. (2021). Life cycle assessment of urban wastewater treatment plants: A critical analysis and guideline proposal. Water Science & Technology, Vol. 83, Issue 3, 501–514. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2020.608
14. Lopes, T., Queiroz, L., Torres, E., Kiperstok, A. (2020). Low complexity wastewater treatment process in developing countries: A LCA approach to evaluate environmental gains. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 720, 137593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137593
15. Lorenzo-Toja, Y., Alfonsin, C., Amores, M., Aldea, X., Marin, D., Moreira, M., Feijoo, G. (2016). Beyond the conventional life cycle inventory in wastewater treatment plants. Science of The Total Environment, Vol. 553, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.073
16. Chen, K., Wang, H., Valverde-Perez, B., Zhai, S., Vezzaro, L., Wang, A. (2021). Optimal control towards sustainable wastewater treatment plants based on multi-agent reinforcement learning. Chemosphere, Vol. 279, 130498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130498
17. Alex, J., Benedetti, L., Copp, J., Gernaey, K.V., Jeppsson, U., Nopens, I., Pons, M.-N., Rieger, L., Rosen, C., Steyer, J.P., Vanrolleghem, P., Winkler, S. (2008). Benchmark Simulation Model no. 1 (BSM1). Dept. of Industrial Electrical Engineering and Automation Lund University. Available at: https://www.iea.lth.se/publications/Reports/LTH-IEA-7229.pdf
18. Revollar, S., Meneses, M., Vilanova, R., Vega, P., Francisco, M. (2021). Eco-Efficiency Assessment of Control Actions in Wastewater Treatment Plants. Water, Vol. 13, Issue 5, 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050612
19. De Ketele, J., Davister, D., Ikumi, D. (2018). Applying performance indices in plantwide modelling for a comparative study of wastewater treatment plant operational strategies. Water SA, Vol. 44, No. 4, 539–550. https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v44i4.03
20. Zaborowska, E., Czerwionka, K., Makinia, J. (2021). Integrated plant-wide modelling for evaluation of the energy balance and greenhouse gas footprint in large wastewater treatment plants. Applied Energy, Vol. 282, Part A, 116126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116126
21. Cassidy, J., Silva, T., Semiao, N., Ramalho, P., Santos, A., Feliciano, J. (2020). Improving wastewater treatment plants operational efficiency and effectiveness through an integrated performance assessment system. H2Open Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 276–287. https://doi.org/10.2166/h2oj.2020.007
22. Silva, C., Saldanha Matos, J., Rosa, M. (2016). A comprehensive approach for diagnosing opportunities for improving the performance of WWTP. Water Science & Technology, Vol. 74, Issue 12, 2935–2945. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.432
23. Longo, S., Hospido, A., Lema, J.M., Mauricio-Iglesias, M. (2018). A systematic methodology for the robust quantification of energy efficiency at wastewater treatment plants featuring Data Envelopment Analysis. Water Research, Vol. 141, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.04.067
24. Kiselev, A.V., Magaril, E.R. (2019). Obespechenie effektivnosti vodoochistki v usloviiakh tsirkuliarnoi ekonomiki kak element ekologo-ekonomicheskoi bezopasnosti territorii (Ensuring Water Treatment Assessment Wi thin Spatial Ecologic al and Economic Security Framework Towards Circular Ec onomy). Vestnik URFU. Seriia ekonomika i upravlenie (Bulletin of UrFU. Series Economics and Management), Vol. 18, No. 6, 911–929. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2019.18.6.044 (In Russ.).
25. Pupyrev, E.I. (2019). Sbor i ochistka khoziaistvenno-bytovykh stochnykh vod: kriticheskii obzor dostignutykh rezultatov (Collection and treatment of domestic wastewater: a critical review of the achieved results). Vestnik MGSU (Vestnik MGSU. Monthly Journal on Construction and architecture), Vol. 14, No. 11, 1365–1407. https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2019.11.1365-1407 (In Russ.).
26. Kiselev, A., Magaril, E., Rada, E.C. (2019). Energy and sustainability assessment of municipal wastewater treatment under circular economy paradigm. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 237, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.2495/ESUS190101
27. Rukavishnikova, I., Kiselev, A., Berezyuk, M., Ashirova, I. (2018). Improvement of the methodology for assessing domestic wastewater treatment quality using benchmarking tools. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Vol. 228, 209–219. https://doi.org/10.2495/WP180211
28. Valiev, V.S., Ivanov, D.V., Shagidullin, R.R., Shamaev, D.E., Mustafina, L.K., Shurmina, N.V., Abdullina, F.M., Bogdanova, O.A., Ziganshin, I.I. (2018). Otsenka vklada zagriazniaiushchikh veshchestv v formirovanie klassa zagriaznennosti poverkhnostnykh vod (Estimation of pollutants contribution to the formation of the surface waterspollution class). Rossiiskii zhurnal prikladnoi ekologii (Russian Journal of Applied Ecology), No. 3, 57–64. (In Russ.).
29. Belloir, C., Stanford, C., Soares, A. (2015). Energy benchmarking in wastewater treatment plants: The importance of site operation and layout. Environmental Technology, Vol. 36, Issue 2, 260–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.951403
30. Kiselev, A.V., Magaril, E.R., Glushankova, I.S., Rudakova, L.V. (2020). Otsenka tekhnologii obrabotki osadkov stochnykh vod v usloviiakh perekhoda k tsirkuliarnoi ekonomike (Analysis of Sewage Sludge Alternatives Towards Circular Economy). Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 329–347. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2020.19.3.016 (In Russ.).
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 22-28-01740, rscf.ru/project/22-28-01740/.
About Authors
Andrey Vladimirovich Kiselev
Junior Research Fellow, Department of Environmental Economics, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID 0000-0002-4199-2582; e-mail: ipkiselyov@mail.ru.
Elena Romenovna Magaril
Doctor of Technical Science, Professor, Head of Department of Environmental Economics, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID 0000-0003-3034-9978; e-mail: magaril67@mail.ru.
For citation
Kiselev, A.V., Magaril, E.R. (2023). Correlation Assessment of Environmental and Energy Features of Wastewater Treatment Plants Towards Circular Economy. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 22, No. 1, 99-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.1.005.
Article info
Received September 27, 2022; Revised November 8, 2022; Accepted November 22, 2022.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.1.005
Download full text article:
~2 MB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
05.03.2023)
Created / Updated: 2 September 2015 / 20 September 2021
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
Contact us
Rector's Office
Rector, Dr. Victor Koksharov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-45-03, e-mail: rector@urfu.ru
Vice-Rector for International Relations, Dr. Maxim Khomyakov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-46-27, e-mail: Maksim.Khomyakov@urfu.ru