Journal of Applied Economic Research
ISSN 2712-7435
Assessment of the Impact of Social Tax Deductions for Personal Income Tax on the Welfare and Inequality of Citizens in Russia
Andrey A. Pugachev
P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl, Russia
Abstract
The increase in the demand for social tax deductions for personal income tax and the increase in their limits, along with the need to overcome poverty and inequality in Russia, are enshrined in the 2023 Presidential Address, which determines the relevance of research on the impact of social tax deductions on welfare and income inequality. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of social tax deductions for personal income tax on the welfare and inequality of citizens in Russia. The hypothesis of the study is that the impact of social tax deductions for personal income tax on the welfare of citizens is insignificant; their impact potential is not realized. As part of the study, correlation and regression analysis was applied (the "Data Analysis" package in Excel): the influence of the share of social tax deductions in the amount of income from personal income tax (factor indicator) on indicators of well-being and inequality (resulting indicators) was estimated. The study uses statistical data from the Federal Tax Service, Rosstat and the database of the study of the transformation of inequality of citizens in Russia, conducted in 2022. As a result of the study, a close relationship was established between the share of social tax deductions in the total amount of personal income tax and indicators of inequality: the Gini coefficient and the quintile coefficient of funds, as well as the lack of connection with indicators of well-being. Social tax deductions smooth out the inequality of citizens to a certain extent, but they have no impact on the level of well-being. Strengthening the importance of social tax deductions for personal income tax is possible due to an increase in their limits. The directions of improving the provision of social tax deductions are differentiation of categories of recipients, indexation of deduction limits and simplification of the procedure for obtaining them. The theoretical significance of the study is to develop an assessment of the impact of social tax deductions on the welfare and inequality of citizens, as well as to enhance it, in comparison with the traditional approach, by analyzing the results of a sociological survey on the demand for deductions by taxpayers. The practical significance of the study is determined by the possibility of taking into account proposals for improving social tax deductions to smooth out inequality.
Keywords
inequality of citizens; welfare of citizens; personal income tax; tax benefits; social tax deductions.
JEL classification
H21, H24References
1. Borshchevskiy, G.A., Mossaki, N.Z. (2021). Development of the tax administration in Russia: Results and prospects. Journal of Tax Reform, Vol. 7, No. 2, 114–133. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2021.7.2.093
2. Osmolovskaya-Suslina, A.L., Borisova, S.R., Moskvina, V.A. (2021). Integral Tax Collection Index as a New Approach to Assessing Tax Administration. Financial Journal, Vol. 13, No. 6, 54–80. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2021-6-54-80
3. Chen, J.J., Qiu, R.T.R., Jiao, X., Song, H., Li, Y. (2023). Tax deduction or financial subsidy during crisis?: Effectiveness of fiscal policies as pandemic mitigation and recovery measures. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, Vol. 4, Issue 2, 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2023.100106
4. Ilyin, V.A., Morev, M.V. (2023). The system of oligarchic capitalism in Russia is inconsistent with the achievement of the goals of the special military operation. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, Vol. 16, No. 4, 9–37. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.1
5. Mayburov, I.A. (2015). Marking the Centenary of Income Tax in Russia: Theoretical Analysis of Key Stages of the Reform. Journal of Tax Reform, Vol. 1, No. 2-3, 161–176. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2015.1.2.010
6. Pinskaya, M.R. (2015). Approaches to understanding the tax equity. Journal of Tax Reform, Vol. 1, No. 1, 90–98. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2015.1.1.006
7. Pugachev, A.A., Parfenova, L.B. (2021). Interrelation Between Welfare and Social Inequality under Implementing Progressive Income Tax Scale. Belarusian Economic Journal, No. 2, 81–93. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.46782/1818-4510-2021-2-81-93
8. Wilkinson, B.R., Hageman, A.M. (2023). The role of political elites in income tax system design and tax fairness. The British Accounting Review, Vol. 55, Issue 3, 101172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2022.101172
9. Lvova, N.A. Pokrovskaya, N.V., Ivanov, V.V. (2017). Socially oriented taxation and how it is perceived (case study of a survey of economists-to-be). Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, Vol. 10, No. 4, 196–211. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/esc/2017.4.52.11
10. Malis, N.I, Grundel, L.P. (2021). Modern trends in increasing the revenue base of regional budgets in an unstable economy. Economic Systems, Vol. 14, No. 1, 159–166. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29030/2309-2076-2021-14-1-159-166
11. Duncan, D., Peter, K. (2012). Unequal Inequalities: Do Progressive Taxes Reduce Income Inequality? IZA Discussion Paper No. 6910. Institute for the Study of Labor, 64 p. Available at: https://docs.iza.org/dp6910.pdf
12. Piketty, T., Saez, E., Zucman, G. (2018). Distributional national accounts: methods and estimates for the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 133, Issue 2, 586–587. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx043
13. Alvaredo, F., Chancel, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., Zucman, G. (2018). World Inequality Report. Executive Summary. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674984769
14. Auten, G., Splinter, D. (2023). Income Inequality in the United States: Using Tax Data to Measure Long-Term Trends. 44 p. Available at: https://davidsplinter.com/AutenSplinter-Tax_Data_and_Inequality.pdf
15. Kessing, S.G., Lipatov, V., Zoubek, J.M. (2020). Optimal Taxation under Regional Inequality. European Economic Review, Vol. 126, 103439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103439
16. Guner, N., Lopez-Daneri, M., Ventura, G. (2023). The looming fiscal reckoning: Tax distortions, top earners, and revenues. Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 50, 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2023.07.003
17. Gbohoui, W., Lam, W.R., Lledo, V. (2019). The Great Divide: Regional Inequality and Fiscal Policy. IMF Working Papers, Vol. 2019, Issue 088, 41 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.5089/9781498311625.001
18. Mihaescu, F., Voinea, L. (2009). The Impact of the Flat Tax Reform on Inequality: The Case of Romania. Wiiw Balkan Observatory Working Papers, No. 81. Balkan Observatory, 23 p. Available at: https://wiiw.ac.at/the-impact-of-the-flat-tax-reform-on-inequality-the-case-of-romania-dlp-3217.pdf
19. Ilie, S. (2020). Income Inequalities in Romania in the Aftermath of the 2008 Economic Crisis. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, Vol. 23, Issue 2, 115–130. https://ipe.ro/rjef/rjef2_20/rjef2_2020p115-130.pdf
20. Tanchev, S. (2021). How the proportional income taxation increases inequality in Bulgaria. Journal of Tax Reform, Vol. 7, No. 3, 44–254. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2021.7.3.101
21. Moździerz, A. (2015). Tax Policy and Income Inequality in the Visegrad Countries. Our Economy, Vol. 61, Issue 6, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/ngoe-2015-0022
22. Martorano, B. (2018). Taxation and inequality in developing countries: Lessons from the recent experience of Latin America. Journal of International Development, Vol. 30, Issue 2, 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3350
23. Pugachev, A.A. (2023). Impact of the Level and Structure of the Tax Burden on Citizens Inequality. Financial Journal, Vol. 15, Issue 3, 59–77. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2023-3-59-77
24. Saidin, N., Basit, A., Hamza, S. (2016). The role of tax on economic growth. International Journal of Accounting & Business Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, 232–250. https://doi.org/10.24924/ijabm/2016.11/v4.iss2/242.250
25. Abdon, A., Estrada, G., Lee, M., Park, D. (2014). Fiscal policy and growth in developing Asia. ADB Economics Working Paper Series, No. 412. Asian Development Bank, 18 р. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2515779
26. Gbato, A. (2017). Impact of taxation on growth in Sub-Saharan Africa: New evidence based on a new data set. International Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 9, No. 11, 173–193. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v9n11p173
27. Balasoiu, N, Chifu, I, Oancea, M. (2023). Impact of Direct Taxation on Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence Based on Panel Data Regression Analysis at the Level of Eu Countries. Sustainability, Vol. 15, Issue 9, 7146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097146
28. Koehne, S., Sachs, D. (2022). Pareto-improving reforms of tax deductions. European Economic Review, Vol. 148, 104214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104214
29. Serocki, J., Murphy, K. (2009). An analysis of the medical expense deduction under the U.S. income tax system. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol. 49, Issue 2, 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2008.05.002
30. Doerrenberg, P., Peichl, A., Siegloch, S. (2017). The elasticity of taxable income in the presence of deduction possibilities. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 151, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.10.001
31. Binder, B., Haupt, A. (2022). The fundamental role of tax systems in the relationship between workfare and inequality in the lower half of the income distribution. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Vol. 80, 100712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2022.100712
32. Ohno, T., Sakamaki, J., Kojima, D., Imahori, T. (2021). Effects of deductions on the tax burden reduction and the redistribution of the income and resident taxes. Japan and the World Economy, Vol. 60, 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2021.101104
33. Bourguignon, F., Spadaro, A. (2012). Tax Benefit Revealed Social Preferences. Journal of Economic Inequality, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 75–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-010-9153-0
34. Romane–Jersova, А., Kotane, I. (2020). The impact of the labor tax burden on the living standard of the inhabitants of Latvia. Journal of Regional Economic and Social Development, Vol. 1, Issue 12. 97–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/jresd2020vol1.12.5388
35. Muranova, A.P. (2021). Income Inequality and Tax Tools to Reduce it in the South-East Asian Countries. Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development, No. 1, 55–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31696/2072-8271-2021-1-1-50-055-065
36. Melnikova, N.P., Tikhonova, A.V. (2018). Property Tax Deductions and Fairness of Personal Income Taxation. International Accounting, Vol. 9, Issue 21, 1100–1112. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24891/ia.21.9.1100
37. Pugachev, A.A. (2015). Improvement tax administering as part of the development of tax potential of a region. Social and Humanitarian Knowledge, Vol. 1, No. 3, 180–189. (In Russ.). http://dx.doi.org/10.18255/2412-6519-2015-3-180-189
38. Ohno, T., Sakamaki, J., Kojima, D., Imahori, T. (2021). Effects of deductions on the tax burden reduction and the redistribution of the income and resident taxes. Japan and the World Economy, 2021. Vol. 60, 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japwor.2021.101104
39. Krokhmal, D.D. (2021). Tax deductions for personal income tax as a tool for solving social problems of the state. Taxes and Taxation, No. 6, 44–59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-065X.2021.6.37166
Acknowledgements
The Research was prepared supported by the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 23-28-00365, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-28-00365/
About Authors
Andrey Aleksandrovich Pugachev
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Researcher, P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Yaroslavl, Russia, (150003, Yaroslavl, Sovetskaya street, 14); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7989-6353 е-mail: andrxim@yandex.ru
For citation
Pugachev, A.A. (2023). Assessment of the Impact of Social Tax Deductions for Personal Income Tax on the Welfare and Inequality of Citizens in Russia. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 22, No. 4, 789-813. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.4.032
Article info
Received September 13, 2023; Revised October 10, 2023; Accepted October 27, 2023.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.4.032
Download full text article:
~567 KB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
12.12.2023)
Created / Updated: 2 September 2015 / 20 September 2021
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
Contact us
Rector's Office
Rector, Dr. Victor Koksharov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-45-03, e-mail: rector@urfu.ru
Vice-Rector for International Relations, Dr. Maxim Khomyakov
Tel. +7 (343) 375-46-27, e-mail: Maksim.Khomyakov@urfu.ru