Intangible Assets and US Stock Returns: An analysis using the Index Method, Panel Regression, and Machine Learning

Adil Haniev

National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

This study examines the impact of intangible assets on stock returns in the U.S. using the Drucker Institute indices, which assess companies based on customer satisfaction, employee engagement and development, innovation, social responsibility, and financial stability. The relevance of this study lies in the growing importance of considering non-financial indicators in investment decision-making. The objective is to determine how these indices affect stock returns across different sectors. The hypotheses posit that each index has a positive impact. The study employs both panel regression with fixed effects and machine learning methods using XGBoost with Shapley values to analyze data from U.S. companies for the period from June 30, 2016, to June 30, 2023. The results indicate that social responsibility has a broadly positive impact on stock returns across various sectors. Innovation significantly affects returns only in the technology sector. Customer satisfaction and financial stability exhibit varying effects depending on the sector, while employee engagement and development show only negative impacts in the energy sector. The significance of this research lies in its contribution to understanding the role of intangible assets in shaping stock performance. We show that investors can achieve both ethical satisfaction and higher financial returns by prioritizing investments in companies with strong social responsibility records. Additionally, we draw the attention of investors and researchers to the importance of considering sectoral affiliation when analyzing companies. The use of advanced analytical tools, such as XGBoost with Shapley values, underscores the potential of machine learning in uncovering complex relationships in financial data. This approach proves to be highly promising for future research.

Keywords

Drucker Institute Indexes; stock returns; ESG; corporate social responsibility; machine learning

JEL classification

References

1. Kim, S., Yoon, A. (2023). Analyzing active fund managers’ commitment to ESG: Evidence from the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment. Management Science, Vol. 69, No. 2, 741–758. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4394

   2. Raghunandan, A., Rajgopal, S. (2022). Do ESG funds make stakeholder-friendly investments? Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3, 822–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09693-1

   3. Diaye, M.A., Ho, S.H., Oueghlissi, R. (2022). ESG performance and economic growth: A panel co-integration analysis. Empirica, Vol. 49, No. 1, 99-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-021-09508-7

   4. Flammer, C. (2015). Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, Vol. 61, No. 11, 2549–2568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038

   5. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D.S. (2011). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, Vol. 37, Issue 5, 1480–1495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385696

   6. He, F., Du, H., Yu, B. (2022). Corporate ESG performance and manager misconduct: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 82, 102201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102201

   7. Cerqueti, R., Ciciretti, R., Dalò, A., Nicolosi, M. (2021). ESG investing: A chance to reduce systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability, Vol. 54, 100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100887

   8. Goss, A., Roberts, G.S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 35, Issue 7, 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002

   9. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.C., Mishra, D.R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 35, Issue 9, 2388–2406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007

   10. Sun, K.A., Kim, D.Y. (2013). Customer satisfaction and firm performance: An application of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 35, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.05.008

   11. Payne, S.C., Webber, S.S. (2006). Effects of Service Provider Attitudes and Employment Status on Citizenship Behaviors and Customers’ Attitudes and Loyalty Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, Issue 2, 365–378. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.2.365

   12. Kumar, V., Pansari, A. (2016). Competitive advantage through engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 53, Issue 4, 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0044

   13. Geroski, P., Machin, S., Van Reenen, J. (1993). The profitability of innovating firms. The Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 24, No. 2, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555757

   14. Love, J.H., Roper, S., Du, J. (2009). Innovation, ownership and profitability. International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 27, Issue 3, 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2008.11.001

   15. Roberts, P.W. (1999). Product innovation, product–market competition and persistent profitability in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20, Issue 7, 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<655::AID-SMJ44>3.0.CO;2-P

   16. Berg, F., Koelbel, J.F., Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, Vol. 26, Issue 6, 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033

   17. Crosby, L.A., Ghanbarpour, T. (2023). The Drucker intangibles measurement system: An academic perspective. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 155, 113452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113452

   18. Ghanbarpour, T., Crosby, L., Johnson, M.D., Gustafsson, A. (2024). The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Stakeholders in Different Business Contexts. Journal of Service Research, Vol. 27, Issue 1, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231207992

   19. Ratigan, D., Zaleski, P.A. (2024). The Drucker indexes and profitability: a first look. Business Economics, Vol. 59, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-023-00347-x

   20. Truong, C., Nguyen, T.H., Huynh, T. (2021). Customer satisfaction and the cost of capital. Review of Accounting Studies, Vol. 26, 293–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09555-8

   21. Luo, X., Homburg, C., Wieseke, J. (2010). Customer satisfaction, analyst stock recommendations, and firm value. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 47, Issue 6, 1041–1058. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.6.1041

   22. Fornell, C., Morgeson III, F.V., Hult, G.T.M. (2016). Stock returns on customer satisfaction do beat the market: Gauging the effect of a marketing intangible. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 80, Issue 5, 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0229

   23. Malshe, A., Colicev, A., Mittal, V. (2020). How Main Street Drives Wall Street: Customer (Dis)satisfaction, Short Sellers, and Abnormal Returns. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 57, Issue 6, 1055–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720954373

   24. Wei, A.P., Peng, C.L., Huang, H.C., Yeh, S.P. (2020). Effects of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: does customer satisfaction matter? Sustainability, Vol. 12, Issue 18, 7545. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187545

   25. Peng, C.L., Lai, K.L., Chen, M.L., Wei, A.P. (2015). Investor sentiment, customer satisfaction, and stock returns. European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, No. 5/6, 827–850. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-01-2014-0026

   26. Ittner, C., Larcker, D., Taylor, D. (2009). Commentary: The Stock Market’s Pricing of Customer Satisfaction. Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 5, 826–835. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0526

   27. Jacobson, R., Mizik, N. (2009). The financial markets and customer satisfaction: Reexamining possible financial market mispricing of customer satisfaction. Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 5, 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0528

   28. Turner, P. (2020). Why is employee engagement important? In: Employee Engagement in Contemporary Organizations. Maintaining High Productivity and Sustained Competitiveness. Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36387-1

   29. Jacobs, R., Washington, C. (2003). Employee development and organizational performance: a review of literature and directions for future research. Human Resource Development International, Vol. 6, Issue 3, 343–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678860110096211

   30. Chi, C.G., Gursoy, D. (2009). Employee satisfaction, customer satisfaction, and financial performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 245–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.08.003

   31. Boustanifar, H., Kang, Y.D. (2022). Employee Satisfaction and Long-Run Stock Returns, 1984–2020. Financial Analysts Journal, Vol. 78, Issue 3, 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2022.2074241

   32. Ben-Nasr, H., Ghouma, H. (2018). Employee welfare and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 48, 700–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.12.007

   33. Bigliardi, B., Ferraro, G., Filippelli, S., Galati, F. (2020). The influence of open innovation on firm performance. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, Vol. 12, 1847979020969545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1847979020969545

   34. Singhal, C., Mahto, R.V., Kraus, S. (2020). Technological innovation, firm performance, and institutional context: a meta-analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 69, Issue 6, 2976–2986. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.3021378

   35. Jia, N. (2018). Corporate innovation strategy and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 53, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.10.006

   36. Ortega-Argilés, R., Piva, M., Vivarelli, M. (2015). The productivity impact of R&D investment: are high-tech sectors still ahead? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 24, Issue 3, 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2014.918440

   37. Coad, A., Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, Vol. 37, Issue 4, 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.003

   38. Dranev, Y., Frolova, K., Ochirova, E. (2019). The impact of fintech M&A on stock returns. Research in International Business and Finance, Vol. 48, 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.01.012

   39. Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, Vol. 112, 106186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106186

   40. Shanaev, S., Ghimire, B. (2022). When ESG meets AAA: The effect of ESG rating changes on stock returns. Finance Research Letters, Vol. 46, 102302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102302

   41. Liu, L., Nemoto, N., Lu, C. (2023). The effect of ESG performance on the stock market during the COVID-19 pandemic – Evidence from Japan. Economic Analysis and Policy, Vol. 79, 702–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.038

   42. Feng, G.F., Long, H., Wang, H.J., Chang, C.P. (2022). Environmental, social and governance, corporate social responsibility, and stock returns: What are the short- and long-Run relationships? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 29, Issue 5, 1884–1895. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2334

   43. Dorfleitner, G., Utz, S., Wimmer, M. (2018). Patience pays off–corporate social responsibility and long-term stock returns. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Vol. 8, Issue 2, 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2017.1403272

   44. Damodaran, A. (2007). Return on Capital (ROC), Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Return on Equity (ROE): Measurement and Implications. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1105499

   45. Rheynaldi, P.K., Endri, E., Minanari, M., Ferranti, P.A., Karyatun, S. (2023). Energy price and stock return: evidence of energy sector companies in Indonesia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Vol. 13, No. 5, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.14544

   46. Jakub, S., Viera, B., Eva, K. (2015). Economic value added as a measurement tool of financial performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 26, 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00877-1

   47. De Wet, J.H.V.H., Du Toit, E. (2007). Return on equity: A popular, but flawed measure of corporate financial performance. South African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 38, No. 1, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v38i1.578

   48. Gu, S., Kelly, B., Xiu, D. (2020). Empirical asset pricing via machine learning. The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 33, Issue 5, 2223–2273. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa009

   49. Teplova, T., Sokolova, T., Kissa, D. (2023). Revealing stock liquidity determinants by means of explainable AI: The role of ESG before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Resources Policy, Vol. 86, 104253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104253

   50. Berger, T. (2023). Explainable artificial intelligence and economic panel data: A study on volatility spillover along the supply chains. Finance Research Letters, Vol. 54, 103757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103757

   51. Chen, T., Guestrin, C. (2016). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.293978

   52. Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 30, 4765–4774. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874

   53. Van Dijk, M.A. (2011). Is size dead? A review of the size effect in equity returns. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 35, Issue 12, 3263–3274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.05.009

   54. Fama, E.F., French, K.R. (2006). Profitability, investment and average returns. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 82, Issue 3, 491–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.09.009

About Authors

Adil Haniev

Post-Graduate Student, Basic Department of Financial Markets Infrastructure, Faculty of Economic Sciences, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia (119049, Moscow, Shabolovka street, 26, Building 1); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6028-4573 e-mail: ahaniev@hse.ru

For citation

Haniev, A. (2024). Intangible Assets and US Stock Returns: An analysis using the Index Method, Panel Regression, and Machine Learning. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 23, No. 3, 833-854. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2024.23.3.033

Article info

Received June 24, 2024; Revised July 29, 2024; Accepted August 5, 2024.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2024.23.3.033

Download full text article: