Journal of Applied Economic Research
ISSN 2712-7435
The Method of Forming an Optimal Corporate Well-Being Program to Maximize the Achievement of Employee KPI Targets
Lev S. Mazelis 1, Gleb V. Grenkin 1, Kirill I. Lavrenyuk 2, Andrey A. Krasko 1
1 Vladivostok State University, Vladivostok, Russia
2 LLC “Yandex”, Moscow, Russia
Abstract
The study was conducted within the framework of an urgent task to study the factors of human capital development of an organization that have a direct or indirect impact on the effectiveness of employees. The development process is viewed through the prism of the formation and implementation of a corporate well-being program. The aim of the work is to develop a method for forming an optimal structure for the distribution of financial resources of an organization in the context of investment areas of its corporate well-being program for the maximum possible progress towards achieving the target values of key performance indicators (KPI) of employees by developing their competencies and reducing burnout. To achieve this goal, a hypothesis is put forward about the possibility of building a tool that allows one to form an optimal structure for the distribution of investments directed towards the implementation of the well-being program to increase the efficiency of the organization's functioning based on functional dependencies constructed by the authors in previous studies, modeling channels of influence between the categories “investments”, “competencies”, “expectations”, “burnout”, and “KPI”. The developed method consists of a model representing a mathematical programming problem and a method for finding its numerical suboptimal solution. The objective function of the model is an integral indicator describing the degree of achievement of the KPIs of the organization's employees. The limitations in the model are the total amount of financial resources for the well-being program and the maximum allowable amount of investments directed towards the areas of the well-being program and employees. Optimization variables are the volume of investments in each individual employee of the company in a certain area of the well-being program at a specific time within the planning period. From a practical point of view, the proposed tool will make it possible to form an optimal investment structure within the framework of the corporate well-being program and will provide support in determining and forming a sound portfolio of program activities, the implementation of which has the maximum possible positive impact on employee productivity.
Keywords
optimization of the investment structure; well-being program; key performance indicator; burnout process; competence development
JEL classification
J24References
1. Rong, C. (2024). The Impact of Employees’ Health and Well-being on Job Performance. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 29, 372–378. https://doi.org/10.54097/9ft7db35
2. Zeyi, L., Jiayin, H. (2024). Key Factors for Sustainability – Corporate Culture and Employee Well-being. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business and Policy Studies, Vol. 78, 263–267. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/78/20241734
3. Winnubst, J. (1993). Organizational structure, social support, and burnout. In: Professional Burnout: Recent Developments in Theory and Research. Edited by W.B. Schaufeli, C. Maslach, T. Marek. Washington DC, Taylor & Francis, 151–162. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315227979
4. Pundani, E.P., Siti, N., Bogy, F., Pradipta, Ch.P. (2023). Employee engagement driving program: Efforts to optimize employee performance. ABDIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Merdeka Malang, Vol. 8, No. 4, 741–750. https://doi.org/10.26905/abdimas.v8i4.11116
5. Konieczny, G., Kolisnichenko, P., Górska, M., Górski, T. (2023). The role of well-being in sustainable corporate development of companies. Economics, Finance and Management Review, Vol. 3, Issue 15, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.36690/2674-5208-2023-3-59-67
6. Loi, R., Liu, Y., Lam, L.Y., Xu, A.J. (2016). Buffering emotional job demands: The interplay between proactive personality and team potency. Journal of Vocational Behavior, Vol. 95-96, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.08.007
7. Siti, M. (2023). The company strategy in improving the work environment to maximize employee’s satisfaction and performance. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Literature, Vol. 2, No. 5, 706–715. https://doi.org/10.53067/ijomral.v2i5.166
8. O’Neill, B.C., Morris, J., Lamontagne, J., Weyant, J., Wise, M. (2024). A framework for multisector scenarios of outcomes for well-being and resilience. Earth's Future, Vol. 12, Issue 5, e2023EF004343. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004343
9. Naczenski, L.M., de Vries, J.D., van Hooff, M.L.M., Kompier, M.A.J. (2017). Systematic review of the association between physical activity and burnout. Journal of Occupational Health, Vol. 59, Issue 6, 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1539/joh.17-0050-RA
10. Trees Bolt, E.E., Homer, S.T. (2023). Employee corporate social responsibility and well-being: the role of work, family and culture spillover. Employee Relations: The International Journal, Vol. 46, Issue 2, 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2023-0097
11. Shih, S.-P., Jiang, J.J., Klein, G., Wang, E. (2013). Job burnout of the information technology worker: Work exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment. Information & Management, Vol. 50, Issue 7, 582–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.08.003
12. Song, Q., Wan, Y., Chen, Y., Benitez, J., Hu, J. (2019). Impact of the usage of social media in the workplace on team and employee performance. Information & Management, Vol. 56, Issue 8, 103160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.04.003
13. Fazielah, M., Norhasni, Z.A. (2024). Enhancing Employee Well-Being and Productivity in Evolving Work Environments. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3, 8–17. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0081
14. Atalya, F., Joyce, A. T. (2023). The Influence of Job Satisfaction, Leadership and Organizational Justice on Employee Well-Being. International Journal of Application on Economics and Business, Vol. 1, No. 1, 232–240. https://doi.org/10.24912/ijaeb.v1i1.232-240
15. Kristiana, Y., Sijabat, R., Sudibjo, N., Bernarto, I. (2024). Hotel Employee Well-Being: The Role of Job Crafting and Work Engagement. International Journal of Religion, Vol. 5, No. 7, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.61707/az74f509
16. Saeed, S., Ahmad, S., Muhammad, H. (2024). Analyzing the Direct and Indirect Effects of Coping Self-Efficacy on Well-Being via Quality of Life: Coping Self-Efficacy's Impact on Well-Being. Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 5, Issue 4, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v5i04.1349
17. Click, E.R., Dobbins, M.A. (2020). Financial Well-Being Program Development. Building Healthy Academic Communities Journal, Vol. 4, No. 1. 58–68. https://doi.org/10.18061/bhac.v4i1.7110
18. Sharma P., Sharma P. (2023). Work-Life Balance as a Determinant of Well-Being in the Banking Sector. International Journal of Indian Psychology, Vol. 11, Issue 2, 1564–1570. https://doi.org/10.25215/1102.164
19. Santillan, E.G., Santillan, E.T., Doringo, J.B., Pigao, K.J.F., Mesina, V.F.C. (2023). Assessing the Impact of a Hybrid Work Model on Job Execution, Work-Life Balance, and Employee Satisfaction in a Technology Company. Journal of Business and Management Studies, Vol. 5, No. 6, 13–38. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2023.5.6.2
20. Verna, V.V., Khoyna, M.N. (2021). Problems of loyalty management of the organization's personnel: the experience of Russian companies. Bulletin of the Kerch State Marine Technological University, No. 3, 193–204. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47404/2619-0605_2021_3_193
21. Gonsiorowska, M., Zieba, M. (2023). Employee Well-being and its Potential Link with Human Knowledge Risks. Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Knowledge Management, Vol. 24, No. 1, 430–436. http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/eckm.24.1.1578
22. Nagibina, N.I., Vakulskaya, E.A., Pestereva, E.O. (2020). Well-being. Managing employee well–being to increase labor productivity - improving HR and business performance of the company. Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia, Vol. 9, No. 4, 289–301. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/2305-7807-2020-8-17
23. Semina, A.P. (2022). A study of the influence of the well-being concept on the effectiveness of a remote team. Moscow Economic Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, 64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.55186/2413046X_2022_7_2_128
24. Hui-Chun, C., Kuo-Ming, C. (2024). A Multilevel Perspective on High-Performance Work System, Mindfulness, Employee Work Well-Being, and Employee Creative Engagement. SAGE Open, Vol. 14, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241242206
25. Mathibe, M.S., Chinyamurindi, W.T. (2021). Determinants of employee mental health in the South African public ser-vice: The role of organizational citizenship behaviors and workplace social support. Advances in Mental Health, Vol. 19, Issue 3, 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2021.1938153
26. Matko, A., Takacs, T. (2017). Examination of the relationship between organizational culture and performance. International Review of Applied Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 99–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/1848.2017.8.1.14
27. Ciulla, J.B. (2020). The importance of leadership in shaping business values. In: The Search for Ethics in Leadership, Business, and Beyond, Vol. 50. Springer Cham, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38463-0_10
28. Bataineh, Kh. (2019). Impact of work-life balance, happiness at work, on employee performance. International Business Research, Vol. 12, No. 2, 99–112. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v12n2p99
29. Arnautov, O.V., Arutyunov, S.V., Gaponenko, A.L., Gaponenko, M.N. (2023). The corporate welfare program of the company's employees. Public Administration, No. 3, 67–76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2023-25-3-67-76
30. Zakharov, D.K., Kashtanova, E.V. (2023). The concept of "well-being in the workplace" as part of modern corporate personnel management programs. Management of the Personnel and Intellectual Resources in Russia, Vol. 12, No. 3, 13–17. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/2305-7807-2023-12-3-13-17
31. Diamantidis, A.D., Chatzoglou, P. (2019). Factors affecting employee performance: an empirical approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 68, Issue 1, 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-01-2018-0012
32. Mazelis, L., Lavrenyuk, K., Grenkin, G., Krasko, A. (2023). Conceptual model for the development of employee competencies through the well-being implementation. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, Vol. 18, No. 11, 3557–3566. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.181120
33. Mazelis, L.S., Grenkin, G.V., Lavrenyuk, K.I. (2024). Modeling the impact of employee competencies on their performance, taking into account burnout. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 227–250. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2024.23.1.010
34. Mazelis, L.S., Lavrenyuk, K.I., Grenkin, G.V. (2023). Analysis of the relationship between employee expectations from the corporate environment of the company and their burnout. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1034–1055. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2023.22.4.0400
35. Mazelis, L.S., Lavrenyuk, K.I., Krasko, A.A. (2023). Modeling the development of employee competence by investing in well-being program activities. Market Economy Problems, Vol. 3, 53–67. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33051/2500-2325-2023-3-53-67
About Authors
Lev Solomonovich Mazelis
Doctor of Economis, Leading Researcher, Laboratory of Strategic Planning, Professor, The Mathematics and Modeling Department, Vladivostok State University, Vladivostok, Russia (690014, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, Gogolya street, 41); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-3960 e-mail: lev.mazelis@vvsu.ru
Gleb Vladimirovich Grenkin
Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Research Intern, Strategic Planning Laboratory, Associate Professor, The Mathematics and Modeling Department, Vladivostok State University, Vladivostok, Russia (690014, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, Gogolya street, 41); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1307-3757 e-mail: glebgrenkin@gmail.com
Kirill Igorevich Lavrenyuk
Project Manager, LLC “Yandex”, Moscow, Russia (119021, Moscow, Lev Tolstoy street, 16); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-3196 email: kirlavrenyuk@yandex-team.ru
Andrey Alexandrovich Krasko
Candidate of Economic Sciences, Researcher, Laboratory of Strategic Planning, Associate Professor, The Mathematics and Modeling Department, Vladivostok State University, Vladivostok, Russia (690014, Primorsky Krai, Vladivostok, Gogolya street, 41); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-5893 e-mail: Andrey.Krasko@vvsu.ru
For citation
Mazelis, L.S., Grenkin, G.V., Lavrenyuk, K.I., Krasko, A.A. (2024). The Method of Forming an Optimal Corporate Well-Being Program to Maximize the Achievement of Employee KPI Targets. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1124-1149. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2024.23.4.044
Article info
Received July 23, 2024; Revised August 20, 2024; Accepted September 7, 2024.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2024.23.4.044
Download full text article:
~964 KB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
29.11.2024)
Created / Updated: 2 September 2015 / 20 September 2021
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
©Ural Federal University named the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin (Website)