Federal Districts and Macroregions: Risks of Spatial Development Heterogeneity

Oleg A. Golovanov 1, Alexander N. Tyrsin 1,2, Elena V. Vasilyeva 1

1 Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia
2 Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Abstract

The article presents a study of Russia's economic discretization from the point of view of ensuring the unity of its economic space. Within the framework of this study it is intended to test the hypothesis that when comparing two grids of zoning according to the risk of spatial development heterogeneity, the more optimal territorial division of Russia that would make it possible to reduce the differentiation of regions in terms of the level and pace of socio-economic development is the federal districts as they retain the established systems of interregional ties, coordination through the plenipotentiary representatives of the President of the Russian Federation and statistical accounting for monitoring the situation. To compare two variants of the country's district grid (federal districts and macroregions) the study proposes an approach to estimating the risks of heterogeneity of spatial development of territories. Two types of risks are considered: the risks of reducing the level of socio-economic development and the risks of uneven spatial development. The first of them is defined as the probability of a decrease in the level of socio-economic development of the territory, the second - as the probability of an increase in the coefficient of variation of socio-economic development level of federal districts and macroregions within the country. The constructed model of multidimensional risk takes into account a system of risk factors in the form of a random vector with correlated (dependent) components. Socio-economic indicators of Russia's regions taken from the Rosstat statistical database are used as risk factors. To estimate the risks, the area of unfavourable outcomes for each of the factors is calculated. On the basis of the proposed approach, we calculated the probability of an unfavourable outcome - a decrease in the level of socio-economic development and increase in inter-regional differentiation of Russia in the context of federal districts and macroregions for the period 2000-2022. According to the obtained results, federal districts and macroregions do not differ significantly in terms of ensuring a common economic space. The significant factors of heterogeneity risks of Russia's spatial development in the context of federal districts and macroregions throughout the considered period are the budgetary potential that ensures sustainable development of the territory and improvement of the population's quality of life, and regional specialisation that determines the structure of the regional economy.

Keywords

interregional differentiation; spatial development; federal district; macroregion; risk analysis

JEL classification

References

1. Vladyko, I.Yu. (2022). Macroregion as an element of strategic spatial management of the regional economy. Region: Systems, Economics, Management, No. 3, 10–19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22394/1997-4469-2022-58-3-10-19

         2. Bukhvald, E.M. (2020). Strategic spatial planning: macro-regions and constituent entities of the Russian Federation. Journal of Russian Law, No. 3, 31–44. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/jrl.2020.028

         3. Zhikharevich, B.S., Pribyshin, T.K. (2021). Spatial development strategy of Russia as a result of science and authorities interacting. Region: Economics and Sociology, No. 4, 3–26. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20210401

         4. Ivanov, O.B., Buchwald, E.M. (2019). Geo-strategic territories" and “points of growth” in the strategy of spatial development of the Russian Federation. ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis, and Practice, No. 4, 7–23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2071-6435-2019-10098

         5. Kuznetsova, O.V. (2019). Problems of elaboration of spatial development strategy of the Russian Federation. Spatial Economics, Vol. 15, No. 4, 107–125. (In Russ.). https://dx.doi.org/10.14530/se.2019.4.107-125

         6. Lavrikova, Yu.G., Suvorova, A.V. (2023). Heterogeneity of Economic development of Russian macroregions. Economy of Regions, Vol. 19, No. 4, 934–948. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-1

         7. Naumov, I.V. Nikulina, N.L. (2022). Assessment of the Spatial Heterogeneity of Economic Activity in the Municipalities of Sverdlovsk Oblast. Economy of Regions, Vol. 18, No. 3, 820–836. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-3-14

         8. Zemskov, V.V. (2020). Risks and threats to the country's spatial development. Economic Security, Vol. 3, No. 3, 313–322. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18334/ecsec.3.3.110793

         9. Golubchenko, I.V. (2018). Zoning of Russia (in connection with the draft of the spatial development strategy). Bulletin of the Moscow Region State University, Series: Natural Sciences, No. 4, 32–38. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7189-2018-4-32-38

         10. Chernyshov, M.M. (2018). The problem of allocation of subjects of the Russian Federation in the macro-regions in the context of strategy formation spatial development of Russia for the period up to 2025. Regional Problems of Transforming the Economy, No. 11, 9–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2018-11-9-25

         11. Stroev, P.V. (2023). Impact of the allocation of economic resources on the spatial organisation of the Russian economy. Economy of Regions, Vol. 19, No. 4, 949–963. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-4-2

         12. Karginova-Gubinova, V.V., Vasilyeva, A.V., Moroshkina, M.V. (2023). Zoning and forecasting as the basis for sustainable spatial development (on the example of the territories of the Republic of Karelia). MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), Vol. 14, No. 3, 450–466. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18184/2079-4665.2023.14.3.450-466

         13. Tatarenko, V.I., Robinson, B.V., Usikova, O.V. (2019). Districts, areas, macroregions. Economics Profession Business, No. 4, 72–76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14258/epb201950

         14. Gubanova, E.S., Kleshch, V.S. (2018). Methods to evaluate uneven socio-economic development of a region. Problems of Territory's Development, No. 6, 30–41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2018.6.98.2

         15. Smith, R.J., Rey, S.J. (2017). Spatial approaches to measure subnational inequality: implications for sustainable development goals. Development Policy Review, Vol. 36, Issue S2, O657–O675. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12363

         16. Blus, P.I., Plotnikov, R.V. (2022). Spatial clustering for reducing intraregional unevenness. Journal of New Economy, Vol. 23, No. 1, 88–108. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-1-5

         17. Zhukov, R.A., Prokopchina, S.V., Plinskaya, M.A., Zhelunitsina, M.A. (2024). Modeling of Functional Relationships of Regional Economic Systems Based on Small Samples Based on Bayesian Intelligent Measurements. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 23, No. 3, 721–750. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2024.23.3.029

         18. Bufetova, A.N. (2022). Heterogeneity in the spatial development of Asian Russia: what inter-regional inequality indicators are silent about. Region: Economics and Sociology, No. 2, 58–81. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20220203

         19. Naumov, I.V., Nikulina, N.L. (2023). Scenario modeling and forecasting of the spatial heterogeneity of innovation development in Russia. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, Vol. 16, Issue 4, 71–87. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2023.4.88.4

         20. Doroshenko, S.V., Vasilyeva, R.I. (2024). Spatial estimation of regional economic growth heterogeneity during 2014‒2021. Russian Journal of Regional Studies, Vol. 32, No. 3, 484–503. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.128.032.202403.484-503

         21. Danilova, I.V., Savelyeva, I.P., Rezepin, A.V. (2022). Impact of inter-territorial cohesion on the development of regional economic spaces. Economy of Regions, Vol. 18, No. 1, 31–48. (In Russ.).  https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2022-1-3

         22. Zabnina, G.G., Skrebova, A.V. (2023). The impact of spatial integration on the development of a microregion. Journal of Applied Research, No. 2, 8–13. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47576/2712-7516_2023_2_8

         23. Kurushina, E.V., Petrov, M.B. (2018). Performance criteria of spatial development projects based on interregional integration. Economy of Regions, Vol. 14, No. 1, 176–189. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/2018–1–14

         24. Shirov, A.A. (2020). Assessment of Interregional Economic Interactions Using Statistics of Freight Railway Transportation. Studies on Russian Economic Development, Vol. 31, No. 2, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700720020112

         25. Proskurnova, K.Yu. (2024). Tools for assessing spatial development of regions. Lomonosov Public Administration Journal. Series 21, Vol. 21, No. 1, 121–138. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.55959/MSU2073-2643-21-2024-1-121-138

         26. Yudina, M.A. (2019). Methodological aspects of detecting macroregional structural shifts. Journal of New Economy, Vol. 20, No. 4. 22–46. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-4-2

         27. Kotov, A.V. (2021). Spatial shift-share analysis as a tool for studying the economic development of Russia’s macroregions. Economy of Regions, Vol. 17, No. 3, 755–768. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2021-3-3

         28. Dzhurka, N.G. (2022). Shift-share analysis: review of spatial versions. Regionalistica, Vol. 9, No. 5, 5–16. (In Russ.). doi.org/10.14530/reg.2022.5.5

         29. Makhrova, A.G., Babkin, R.A. (2022). Official and “real” cities: the case study of Moscow metropolitan area. Regional Research of Russia, Vol. 12, Issue 4, 508–519. https://doi.org/10.1134/s2079970522700241

         30. Abdullaev, A.M., Zemlyanskii, D.Yu., Kalinovskii, L.V., Medvednikova, D.M. (2024). Socioeconomic Situation of Russian Urban Agglomerations in 2015–2021. Regional Research of Russia, Vol. 14, Issue 2, 143–159. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970524600045

         31. Lachininsky, S.S., Sorokin, I.S. (2021). Spatial structure and development of settlements in the Saint Petersburg agglomeration. Baltic Region, Vol. 13, Issue 1, 48–69. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2021-1-3

         32. Golovanov, O.A., Tyrsin, A.N., Vasilyeva, E.V. (2023). Modeling economic security risks for Russian regions in the context of sanctions pressure. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, Vol. 16, Issue 5, 49–65. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2023.5.89.3

         33. Nikolaev, M.A. (2022). Risks and threats to the economic security of Russian regions in the digital economy. Regional Economy and Management: Electronic Scientific Journal, No. 4, 7212. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/1999-2645-2022-472-12

         34. Lavrikova, Yu.G., Suvorova, A.V. (2021). Threats to national spatial development: features of assessment. Economics and Management, Vol. 27, No. 3, 152–164. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-3-152-164

         35. Tyrsin, A.N., Surina. A.A. (2017). Modeling of risk in multidimensional stochastic systems. Tomsk State University Journal of Control and Computer Science, No. 39, 65–72. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/19988605/39/9

         36. Ganicheva, A.V., Ganichev, A.V. (2022). Estimating the number of terms in the sum of independent random variables when modeling gaussian random variables. Economics. Information Technologies, Vol. 49, No. 3, 546–557. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52575/2687-0932-2022-49-3-546-557

         37. Fisher, R.A. (1922). On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Vol. 222, 309–368. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1922.0009

         38. Shirov, A.A. (2023). The Russian economy – opportunities for structural and technological redistribution. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, Vol. 241, No. 3, 61–71. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2023-241-3-61-71

         39. Shirov, A.A., Belousov, D.R., Blokhin, A.A., Gusev, M.S., Klepach, A.N., Uzyakov, M.N. (2024). Russia 2035: The New Quality of the National Economy. Studies on Russian Economic Development, Vol. 35, Issue 2, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700724020151

         40. Voroshilov, N.V. (2019). Approaches to assessing the development of agglomerations in Russia. Problems of Territory's Development, No. 4, 40–54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15838/ptd.2019.4.102.2

         41. Strizhkova, L.A., Tishina, L.I., Selivanova, M.V. (2021). Structural shifts in the economy of the Russian Federation and its import intensity in 2014–2019: analysis of macroeconomic statistics. Voprosy Statistiki, Vol. 28, No. 5, 5–27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34023/2313-6383-2021-28-5-5-27

         42. Pechenskaya, M.A. (2019). Budget potential of municipal entities: assessment and directions for development (on the example of Vologda oblast). Studies on Russian Economic Development, Vol. 30, Issue 4, 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700719040105

         43. Rastvortseva, S.N., Snitko, L.T. (2020). Regional specialization and agglomeration effects in the Russian economy. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, Vol. 13, Issue 3, 46–58. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2020.3.69.4

         44. Oprea, F., Onofrei, M., Lupu, D., Vintila, G., Paraschiv, G. (2020). The determinants of economic resilience. The case of Eastern European regions. Sustainability, Vol. 12, Issue 10, 4228. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104228

         45. Aganbegyan, A.G. (2021). From stagnation and crisis to the socio-economic rise of Russia. Healthcare Management: News, Views, Education. Bulletin of VSHOUZ, Vol. 7, No. 2, 4–27. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33029/2411-8621-2021-7-2-4-27

         46. Gluschenko, K. (2015). Impact of the global crisis on spatial disparities in Russia. Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 94, Issue 1, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12030

         47. Zubarevich, N.V., Safronov, S.G. (2023). Regional inequality and its changes: budget projection. Regional Research, No. 1, 31–41. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2023-1-3

         48. Kryukov, V.A., Seliverstov, V.E. (2022). Strategic planning of the spatial development of Russia and its macro-regions: Captured to old illusions. Russian Economic Journal, No. 5, 22–40. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33983/0130-9757-2022-5-22-40

         49. Morgunov, E.V., Chernyavskiy, S.V., Solomshchuk, A.N., Fatullaev, S.T. (2022). Analysis of the potential of human development and the mutual influence of life expectancy and population density by regions of Russia. Tomsk State University Journal of Economics, No. 59, 39–57. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/59/3

         50. Dokholyan, S.V. (2021). Directions for improving the socio-economic policy of the development of the problem region (on the example of the North Caucasus Federal District). Regional Problems of Transforming the Economy, No. 10, 115–122. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26726/1812-7096-2021-10-115-122

         51. Kuznetsova, O.V., Druzhinin, A.G. (2024). On a spatial development strategy for Russia. Studies on Russian Economic Development, Vol. 35, Issue 4, 490–496. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700724700047

         52. Fedorova, E.A., Chernikova, L.I., Pastukhova, A.E. (2020). Regional ratings for assessing the level of tourism growth. Spatial Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 100–122. (In Russ.). https://dx.doi.Org/10.14530/se.2020.1.100-122

         53. Antonov, E.V., Kurichev, N.K., Treivish, A.I. (2022). Studies of the urban system and agglomerations in Russia. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk. Seriya Geograficheskaya, Vol. 86, No. 3, 310–331. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S2587556622030037

         54. Minakir, P.A. (2019). Russian economic space: strategic impasses. Economy of Region, Vol. 15, No. 4, 967–980. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/2019-4-1

Acknowledgements

The article was prepared in accordance with the plan of scientific research works of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

About Authors

Oleg Alexandrovich Golovanov

Junior Researcher, Center for Economic Security, Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620014, Yekaterinburg, Moskovskaya street, 29); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-6954 e-mail: golovanov.oa@uiec.ru

Alexander Nikolaevich Tyrsin

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher, Center for Economic Security, Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620014, Yekaterinburg, Moskovskaya street, 29); Professor, Applied Mathematic sand Mechanics Department, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2660-1221 e-mail: at2001@yandex.ru

Elena Vitalievna Vasilyeva

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Head of Center for Economic Security, Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620014, Yekaterinburg, Moskovskaya street, 29); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0446-1555 e-mail: vasileva.ev@uiec.ru

For citation

Golovanov, O.A., Tyrsin, A.N., Vasilyeva, E.V. (2025). Federal Districts and Macroregions: Risks of Spatial Development Heterogeneity. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 152-187. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.1.006

Article info

Received October 9, 2024; Revised November 3, 2024; Accepted November 6, 2024.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.1.006

Download full text article: