Economic Efficiency of Alternative Energy Supply Technologies for Consumers in the Sverdlovsk Region

Galina S. Chebotareva, Artyom A. Dvinayninov, Alexey D. Berdnikov, Danil A. Tinarsky

Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Abstract

Decarbonization that has become a global trend in the contemporary economy is associated with the development of low-carbon energy, reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, etc. It is possible to effectively embrace this challenge through the use of large biogas plants. They allow autonomous and environmentally friendly provision of all energy needs of private consumers. However, existing social gasification programs may hinder the spread of ultra-capital-intensive biogas projects. The purpose is to assess the economic efficiency of replacing traditional methods of energy supply to private consumers in Russia's regions with alternative biogas technologies. It is hypothesized that biogas plants are a real economic alternative to mainline gas supply and other technologies, regardless of the distance to private consumers. The authors' approach is based on a discounted valuation of technologies during the life cycle, achieved savings, and scenario cost allocation. The efficiency indicator is the cost of gas consumed, and the decision is made on the basis of a comparative assessment in compliance with the principle of least cost. The objects are three alternatives – mainline, liquefied gas and a biogas plant. The calculations are carried out for a rural settlement located in the Sverdlovsk region. The scenario assessment proved that the hypothesis is fully justified. A large biogas plant can become an economic alternative to traditional energy supply, regardless of the distance between the consumers and the main networks. The main condition is that the owner is an agro–industrial enterprise that is able to provide the required amount of raw materials and cover 95% of the costs, taking into account the savings achieved. The company’s participation in the project is feasible as it is required to comply with waste disposal abd eco-efficiency legislation. The paper theoretically substantiates the possible economic benefits for the enterprise, which is the area of future research. The findings are of theoretical and practical importance. This methodology can be applied whenassessing the efficiency of using biogas plants when an agro-industrial enterprise enters the retail electricity market.

Keywords

biogas plant; renewable energy; main gas supply; liquefied gas; economic efficiency

JEL classification

References

1. Fedorova, E., Fedorova, V., Vovkodav, K., Kadzhaeva, E. (2022). Natural gas and new energy sources: the path from competition to synergy. Energy Policy, No. 7, 26–37. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.46920/2409-5516_2022_7173_26

         2. Chebotareva, G.S., Dvinayninov, A.A. (2023). Economic feasibility of gasification scenarios in remote areas (the case of Sverdlovsk region, Russia). R-Economy, Vol. 9, No. 1, 5–18. http://doi.org/10.15826/recon.2023.9.1.001

         3. Chebotareva, G., Strielkowski, W., Berdnikov, A., Tinarsky, D. (2024). Regional perspective on prospects and risks of the renewable energy in Russia. Energy Science and Engineering, Vol. 12, Issue 10, 4139–4165. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1868

         4. Chebotareva, G.S., Dvinayninov, A.A. (2021). An Economic Alternative to Replacing Centralized Gas Supply with Autonomous Biogas Facilities in Russian Cities. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, 582–612. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2021.20.3.023

         5. Chebotareva, G., Čábelková, I., Strielkowski, W., Smutka, L., Zielińska-Chmielewska, A., Bielski S. (2023). The Role of State in Managing the Wind Energy Projects: Risk Assessment and Justification of the Economic Efficiency. Energies, Vol. 16, Issue 12, 4807. http://doi.org/10.3390/en16124807

         6. Awafo, E.A., Amenorfe, J. (2021). Techno-economic studies of an industrial biogas plant to be implemented at Kumasi Abattoir in Ghana. Scientific African, Vol. 11, e00712. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2021.e00712

         7. Wang, X., Chen, Y., Sui, P., Gao, W., Qin, F., Wu, X., Xiong, J. (2014). Efficiency and sustainability analysis of biogas and electricity production from a large-scale biogas project in China: an emergy evaluation based on LCA. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 65, 234–245. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.001

         8. Zhang, C., Xu, Y. (2020). Economic analysis of large-scale farm biogas power generation system considering environmental benefits based on LCA: A case study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 258, 120985. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120985

         9. Wehner, M., Lichtmannegger, T., Robra, S., Precci Lopes, A.D.C., Ebner, C., Bockreis, A. (2021). The economic efficiency of the co-digestion at WWTPs: A full-scale study. Waste Management, Vol. 133, 110–118. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.031

         10. Fareed, M.I., Rehman, M.A., Ahmad, S., Ghaffar, I. (2019). Techno-Economic Feasibility of Biogas Plants in Pakistan. Acta Scientific Microbiology, Vol. 2, Issue 10, 85–90. http://doi.org/10.31080/ASMI.2019.02.0377

         11. Adeoti, O., Ilori, M.O., Oyebisi, T.O., Adekoya, L.O. (2000). Engineering design and economic evaluation of a family-sized biogas project in Nigeria. Technovation, Vol. 20, Issue 2, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00105-4

         12. Esposito, L., Vecchio, C., Cattaneo, G., Gu, Z., Scotto di Perta, E. (2023). Addressing Challenges and Outcomes in the Biogas Sector: An Analysis of Efficiency, Economic Savings, and Environmental Impacts Using an Advanced SWOT Model. Energies, Vol. 16, Issue 21, 7413. http://doi.org/10.3390/en16217413

         13. Anichin, V.L., Dobrunova, A.I., Akupiian, O.S. (2024). Analysis of subsidizing agricultural producers in the Belgorod region. Economics of Agriculture of Russia, No. 2, 51–55. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.32651/242-51

         14. Elyakova, I.D., Noyeva, E.Y., Khristoforov, et al. (2016). Prospects for development of renewable energy sources to preserve the ecosystem of Arctic Zone of Russia. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol. 9, Issue 46, 107556. http://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i46/107556

         15. Rafiee, A., Khalilpour, K.R., Prest, J., Skryabin, I. (2021). Biogas as an energy vector. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 144, 105935. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105935

         16.    Kozłowski, K., Pietrzykowski, M., Czekała, W., et al. (2019). Energetic and economic analysis of biogas plant with using the dairy industry waste. Energy, Vol. 183, 1023–1031. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.179

         17. Kusz, D., Kusz, B., Wicki, L., et al. (2024). The Economic Efficiencies of Investment in Biogas Plants – A Case Study of a Biogas Plant Using Waste from a Dairy Farm in Poland. Energies, Vol. 17, Issue 15, 3760. http://doi.org/10.3390/en17153760

         18. Ciula, J., Gaska, K., Iljuczonek, L., Generowicz, A., Koval, V. (2019). Energy efficiency economics of conversion of biogas from the fermentation of sewage sludge to biomethane as a fuel for automotive vehicles. Architecture Civil Engineering Environment, Vol. 12, Issue 2, 131–140. http://doi.org/10.21307/ACEE-2019-029

         19. Klimek, K., Kaplan, M., Syrotyuk, S., et al. (2021). Investment Model of Agricultural Biogas Plants for Individual Farms in Poland. Energies, Vol. 14, Issue 21, 7375. http://doi.org/10.3390/en14217375

         20. Wang, J., Chai, Y., Shao, Y., Qian, X. (2021). Techno-economic Assessment of Biogas Project: a Longitudinal Case Study from Japan. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Vol. 164, 105174. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105174

         21. Nurgaliev, T., Koshelev, V., Muller, J. (2023). Simulation Model for Biogas Project Efficiency Maximization. BioEnergy Research, Vol. 16, 1084–1098. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10484-4

         22. An, J., Sokolinskaya, N.E. (2019). Economic valuation of biogas production in Russia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1399, Issue 3, 033072. http://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1399/3/033072

         23. Meyer, E.L., Overen, O.K., Obileke, K.C., et al. (2021). Financial and economic feasibility of bio-digesters for rural residential demand-side management and sustainable development. Energy Reports, Vol. 7, 1728–1741. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.013

         24. Tsagarakis, K.P., Papadogiannis, C. (2006). Technical and economic evaluation of the biogas utilization for energy production at Iraklio Municipality, Greece. Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 47, Issues 7-8, 844–857. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2005.06.017

         25. Volpi, M.P.C., Fuess, L.T., Moraes, B.S. (2023). Economic performance of biogas production and use from residues co-digestion in integrated 1G2G sugarcane biorefineries: Better electricity or biomethane? Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 277, 116673. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.116673

         26. Mohammed, M., Egyir, I.S., Donkor, A.K., et al. (2017). Feasibility study for biogas integration into waste treatment plants in Ghana. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, Vol. 26, Issue 3, 695–703. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.10.004

         27. Chen, L., Cong, R., Shu, B., Mi, Z. (2017). A sustainable biogas model in China: The case study of Beijing Deqingyuan biogas project. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 78, 773–779. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.027

         28. Buragohain, S., Mohanty, K., Mahanta, P. (2021). Hybridization of solar photovoltaic and biogas system: Experimental, economic and environmental analysis. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, Vol. 45, 101050. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101050

         29. Abbas, T., Ali, G., Adil, S.A., Bashir, M.K., Kamran, M.A. (2017). Economic analysis of biogas adoption technology by rural farmers: The case of Faisalabad district in Pakistan. Renewable Energy, Vol. 107, 431–439. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.060

         30. Lawson, N., Alvarado-Morales, M., Tsapekos, P., Angelidaki, I. (2021). Techno-Economic Assessment of Biological Biogas Upgrading Based on Danish Biogas Plants. Energies, Vol. 14, Issue 24, 8252. http://doi.org/10.3390/en14248252

         31. Govender, I., Thopil, G.A., Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2019). Financial and economic appraisal of a biogas to electricity project. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 214, 154–165. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.290

         32. Cudjoe, D., Nketiah, E., Obuobi, B., Adu-Gyamfi, G., Adjei, M., Zhu, B. (2021). Forecasting the potential and economic feasibility of power generation using biogas from food waste in Ghana: Evidence from Accra and Kumasi. Energy, Vol. 226, 120342. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120342

         33. Canote, S.J.B., Barros, R.M., Lora, E.E.S., et al. (2021). Energy and Economic Evaluation of the Production of Biogas from Anaerobic and Aerobic Sludge in Brazil. Waste and Biomass Valorization, Vol. 12, 947–969. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01046-w

         34. Silva, H.L.D.C., Córdova, M.E.H., Barros, R.M., et al. (2022). Lab-scale and economic analysis of biogas production from swine manure. Renewable Energy, Vol. 186, 350–365. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.114

         35. Sivtseva, Z.G., Druzyanova, V.P., Spiridonova, A.V., Samuilo, V.V., Panova, E.V. (2023). Pyrolysis technology for creating an autonomous power supply. Far Eastern Agrarian Bulletin, Vol. 17, Issue 3, 127–137. http://doi.org/10.22450/19996837_2023_3_127

         36. Fadeeva, N.A., Vasilyev, O.A. (2018). Efficiency of processing products application of biogas plant in greenhouse farming. Vestnik of Kazan State Agrarian University, Vol. 12, No. 4, 42–44. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.12737/article_5a5f05a3301649.45392015

         37. Sritrakul, N., Hudakorn, T. (2020). The economic value and satisfaction of substituting LPG in households by a biogas network: A case study of Bo Rae Subdistrict in Chai Nat Province Thailand. Energy Reports, Vol. 6, Supplement 2, 565–571. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.11.120

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant of Russian Science Foundation (N 23-78-01242, https://rscf.ru/en/project/23-78-01242/).

About Authors

Galina Sergeevna Chebotareva

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Researcher, Department of Energy and Industrial Enterprises Management Systems, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7496-4927 e-mail: g.s.chebotareva@urfu.ru

Artyom Andreevich Dvinayninov

Junior Researcher, Senior Lecturer, Department of Energy and Industrial Enterprises Management Systems, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9852-1861 e-mail: aadvinianinov@urfu.ru

Alexey Dmitrievich Berdnikov

Assistant, Department of Energy and Industrial Enterprises Management Systems, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7934-8854 e-mail: berdnikov.alexey@urfu.ru

Danil Alexandrovich Tinarsky

Assistant, Department of Energy and Industrial Enterprises Management Systems, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1355-9382 e-mail: danil.tinarsky@urfu.ru

For citation

Chebotareva, G.S., Dvinayninov, A.A., Berdnikov, A.D., Tinarsky, D.A. (2025). Economic Efficiency of Alternative Energy Supply Technologies for Consumers in the Sverdlovsk Region. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, 216-256. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.1.008

Article info

Received September 23, 2024; Revised November 15, 2024; Accepted November 29, 2024.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.1.008

Download full text article: