Journal of Applied Economic Research
ISSN 2712-7435
The Impact of Technology on Business in the United Arab Emirates: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective
Saira Saira 1, Sheeraz Ali 2, Callistus D. Odeh 1
1 Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia
2 Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education, Karachi, Pakistan
Abstract
The rapid embracement of technology in business operations within the United Arab Emirates (UAE) highlights the growing need to understand the determinants of technology adoption. As companies continue to mechanize their processes, it is more critical to explore how employees perceive and utilize these technological systems. The current study examined the impact of technology on UAE companies according to the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), a widely applied conceptual model for user acceptance. The main objectives were to quantify the influence of perceived usefulness (PU), perceived ease of use (PEU), and attitude towards the system (ATT) on actual system use (ASU). The study postulated that PU and PEU positively influence ASU, whereas ATT's influence can be contingent upon the situation. A quantitative survey was conducted among 100 UAE employees representing various industries through a standardized questionnaire. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings indicated PEU to be the strongest predictor of ASU (β = 0.781, p < 0.001), validating that usability is a strong driver for technology use. PU was also found to significantly influence ASU (β = 0.001, p < 0.001), which means perceived utility as a critical factor. Theoretically, this research builds upon TAM theory by putting more emphasis on usability in emerging markets. Practically, it encourages UAE firms to invest in simple-to-use systems and training initiatives to make digital transformation less agonizing.
Keywords
perceived usefulness (PU); perceived ease of use (PEU); attitude towards the system (ATT); Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); digital transformation; UAE businesses
JEL classification
O33, M15, C83References
1. Jo, H., Bang, Y. (2023). Understanding continuance intention of enterprise resource planning (ERP): TOE, TAM, and IS success model. Heliyon, Vol. 9, Issue 10, e21019. doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21019
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, Issue 2, 179–211. doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
3. Alsyouf, A., Lutfi, A., Alsubahi, N., Alhazmi, F.N., Al-Mugheed, K., Anshasi, R.J., Albugami, M. (2023). The use of a technology acceptance model (TAM) to predict patients’ usage of a personal health record system: the role of security, privacy, and usability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 20, Issue 2, 1347. doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20021347
4. Rukhiran, M., Wong-In, S., Netinant, P. (2023). User acceptance factors related to biometric recognition technologies of examination attendance in higher education: TAM model. Sustainability, Vol. 15, Issue 4, 3092. doi.org/10.3390/su15043092
5. Ki, H.T.T., Tapanainen, T., Zaza, S., Huvila, I. (2024). Antecedents of Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease-of-Use (PEOU) in the Heuristic-Systematic Model: The Context of Online Diabetes Risk Test. Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management, Vol. 31, Issue 5, 17–39. doi.org/10.21219/jitam.2024.31.5.017
6. Kim, J., Park, E. (2022). Understanding social resistance to determine the future of Internet of Things (IoT) services. Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 41, Issue 3, 547–557. doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1827033
7. Saputra, D.E.E., Maulida Rahma, V., Eliyana, A., Pratama, A.S., Anggraini, R.D., Kamil, N.L.M., Ismail, I. (2023). Do system quality and information quality affect job performance? The mediation role of users’ perceptions. PlosOne, Vol. 18, Issue 6, e0285293. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285293
8. Turel, O., Qahri-Saremi, H. (2023). Responses to ambivalence toward social networking sites: A typological perspective. Information Systems Journal, Vol. 33, Issue 2, 385–416. doi.org/10.1111/isj.12407
9. Shahin, M., Chen, F.F., Hosseinzadeh, A., Koodiani, H.K., Shahin, A., Nafi, O.A. (2023). A smartphone-based application for an early skin disease prognosis: Towards a lean healthcare system via computer-based vision. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Vol. 57, 102036. doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2023.102036
10. Daryanto, E. (2022). The Influence of Information System Quality, Information Quality and Perceived Usefulness on User Satisfaction of Personnel Information Systems (Study at The Indonesian Army Crypto and Cyber Center). Journal of Positive School Psychology, Vol. 6, No. 3, 9814–9830. Available at: www.journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/5457/3644
11. Rezvani, S., Heidari, S., Roustapisheh, N., Dokhanian, S. (2022). The effectiveness of system quality, habit, and effort expectation on library application use intention: the mediating role of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user satisfaction. International Journal of Business Information Systems, Vol. 1, Issue 1, 1–18. dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2022.10049515
12. Senna, P.P., Ferreira, L.M.D., Barros, A.C., Roca, J.B., Magalhães, V. (2022). Prioritizing barriers for the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 171, 108428. doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108428
13. Iyanna, S., Kaur, P., Ractham, P., Talwar, S., Islam, A.N. (2022). Digital transformation of healthcare sector. What is impeding adoption and continued usage of technology-driven innovations by end-users? Journal of Business Research, Vol. 153, 150–161. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.08.007
14. Qi, Y., Sajadi, S.M., Baghaei, S., Rezaei, R., Li, W. (2024). Digital technologies in sports: Opportunities, challenges, and strategies for safeguarding athlete wellbeing and competitive integrity in the digital era. Technology in Society, Vol. 77, 102496. doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102496
15. Hussain, A., Zhiqiang, M., Li, M., Jameel, A., Kanwel, S., Ahmad, S., Ge, B. (2025). The mediating effects of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use on nurses’ intentions to adopt advanced technology. BMC Nursing, Vol. 24, 33. dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02648-8
16. Wang, N., Zhang, J., Yu, X. (2024). Sustainability-driven technology road mapping: a strategic framework for sustainable development with moderation of ease of use. International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, 406–422. doi.org/10.1504/IJISCM.2024.144422
17. Malmous, M., Zaidoune, S. (2025). Student Adoption of AI Writing Tools: A PLS-SEM and TAM-Based Analysis in Moroccan Higher Education. In: Next-Generation AI Methodologies in Education. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 209–254. doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-7220-3.ch009
18. Ibrahim, A., Shiring, E. (2022). The Relationship between Educators' Attitudes, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Ease of Use of Instructional and Web-Based Technologies: Implications from Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). International Journal of Technology in Education, Vol. 5, No. 4, 535–551. doi.org/10.46328/ijte.285
19. Hidayat, H., Mohd Isa, M.R., Tanucan, J.C.M., Harmanto, D., Anwar, M., Hanesman, H., Dewi, F.K. (2024). Analysis of Computational Thinking Skill Through Technology Acceptance Model Approach Using Augmented Reality in Electronics Engineering Education. TEM Journal, Vol. 13, Issue 2, 1423–1431. dx.doi.org/10.18421/TEM132-56
20. Magboul, I., Jebreel, M., Shawtri, F., Qabajeh, M., Shanti, A., Alqudah, M., Abu Huson, Y. (2024). Factors influencing accounting information system usage by oil companies & performance outcomes. Cogent Business & Management, Vol. 11, Issue 1, 2369211. doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2369211
21. Wai, L.C., Isa, A.M.M., Bhandari, P., Senathirajah, A.R.B.S., Haque, R., Devasia, S.N., Al-Hunaiyyan, A. (2024). Factors influencing job satisfaction to ensure sustainable growth amongst family-owned organizations in Malaysia. Kurdish Studies, Vol. 12, Issue 1, 3144–3173. dx.doi.org/10.58262/ks.v12i1.227
22. Lavuri, R., Jindal, A., Akram, U. (2022). How perceived utilitarian and hedonic value influence online impulse shopping in India? Moderating role of perceived trust and perceived risk. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. 14, No. 4, 615–634. doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-11-2021-0169
23. Al-Mamary, Y.H.S. (2022). Why do students adopt and use learning management systems? Insights from Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 100088. doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100088
24. Martínez-Peláez, R., Ochoa-Brust, A., Rivera, S., Félix, V.G., Ostos, R., Brito, H., Mena, L.J. (2023). Role of digital transformation for achieving sustainability: mediated role of stakeholders, key capabilities, and technology. Sustainability, Vol. 15, Issue 14, 11221. doi.org/10.3390/su151411221
25. Alalwan, A.A., Baabdullah, A.M., Fetais, A.H.M., Algharabat, R.S., Raman, R., Dwivedi, Y.K. (2024). SMEs entrepreneurial finance-based digital transformation: towards innovative entrepreneurial finance and entrepreneurial performance. Venture Capital, Vol. 26, Issue 4, 401–429. doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2023.2195127
26. Prastiawan, D.I., Aisjah, S., Rofiaty, R. (2021). The Effect of Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and Social Influence on the Use of Mobile Banking through the Mediation of Attitude Toward Use. Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, Vol. 9, No. 3, 243–260. dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2021.009.03.4
27. Ajibade, S., Zaidi, A.T. (2023). Technological Acceptance Model for Social Media Networking in e-Learning in Higher Educational Institutes. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 13, No. 2, 239–246. dx.doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.2.1801
28. Abdul-Halim, N.A., Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Hanifah, H., Teoh, A.P., Nawaser, K. (2022). Understanding the determinants of e-wallet continuance usage intention in Malaysia. Quality & Quantity, Vol. 56, 3413–3439. doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01276-7
29. Almaiah, M.A., Al-Rahmi, A., Alturise, F., Hassan, L., Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., Aldhyani, T.H. (2022). Investigating the effect of perceived security, perceived trust, and information quality on mobile payment usage through near-field communication (NFC) in Saudi Arabia. Electronics, Vol. 11, Issue 23, 3926. doi.org/10.3390/electronics11233926
30. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, 319–340. doi.org/10.2307/249008
31. Leong, Y.R., Tajudeen, F.P., Chung, Y.W. (2024). Usage and impact of the internet-of-things-based smart home technology: a quality-of-life perspective. Universal Access in the Information Society, Vol. 23, 345–364. doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00937-0
32. Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O., Demir Kaya, M. (2024). The roles of personality traits, AI anxiety, and demographic factors in attitudes toward artificial intelligence. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 40, Issue 2, 497–514. doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
33. Al-Rahmi, A.M., Al-Rahmi, W.M., Alturki, U., Aldraiweesh, A., Almutairy, S., Al-Adwan, A.S. (2022). Acceptance of mobile technologies and M-learning by university students: An empirical investigation in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 27, 7805–7826. doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10934-8
34. Derecho, K.C., Cafino, R., Aquino-Cafino, S.L., Isla Jr, A., Esencia, J.A., Lactuan, N.J., Velasco, L.C.P. (2024). Technology adoption of electronic medical records in developing economies: A systematic review on physicians’ perspective. Digital Health, Vol. 10, 20552076231224605. doi.org/10.1177/20552076231224605
35. Vhatkar, M.S., Raut, R.D., Gokhale, R., Kumar, M., Akarte, M., Ghoshal, S. (2024). Leveraging digital technology in retailing business: Unboxing synergy between omnichannel retail adoption and sustainable retail performance. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 81, 104047. doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104047
36. Nicolescu, L., Tudorache, M. T. (2022). Human-computer interaction in customer service: the experience with AI chatbots – A systematic literature review. Electronics, Vol. 11, Issue 10, 1579. doi.org/10.3390/electronics11101579
37. Kaplan, A.D., Kessler, T.T., Brill, J.C., Hancock, P.A. (2023). Trust in artificial intelligence: Meta-analytic findings. Human Factors, Vol. 65, Issue 2, 337–359. doi.org/10.1177/00187208211013988
38. Stahl, B.C., Schroeder, D., Rodrigues, R. (2023). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Case Studies and Options for Addressing Ethical Challenges. Springer Cham, 116 p. dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17040-9
39. Song, Y., Gui, L., Wang, H., Yang, Y. (2023). Determinants of continuous usage intention in community group buying platform in China: Based on the information system success model and the expanded technology acceptance model. Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 13, Issue 11, 941. doi.org/10.3390/bs13110941
40. Lutfi, A., Alsyouf, A., Almaiah, M.A., Alrawad, M., Abdo, A.A.K., Al-Khasawneh, A.L., Saad, M. (2022). Factors influencing the adoption of big data analytics in the digital transformation era: Case study of Jordanian SMEs. Sustainability, Vol. 14, Issue 3, 1802. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031802
41. Park, I., Kim, D., Moon, J., Kim, S., Kang, Y., Bae, S. (2022). Searching for new technology acceptance model under social context: Analyzing the determinants of acceptance of intelligent information technology in digital transformation and implications for the requisites of digital sustainability. Sustainability, Vol. 14, Issue 1, 579. doi.org/10.3390/su14010579
42. Zimba, O., Gasparyan, A.Y. (2023). Designing, conducting, and reporting survey studies: a primer for researchers. Journal of Korean Medical Science, Vol. 38, Issue 48, e403. doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e403
43. Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2–24. doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
44. Yusoff, A.S.M., Peng, F.S., Abd Razak, F.Z., Mustafa, W.A. (2020). Discriminant validity assessment of religious teacher acceptance: The use of HTMT criterion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 1529, 042045. doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/4/042045
45. Chin, W.W. (1998). Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 3, 313–334. doi.org/10.2307/249668
46. Dwivedi, Y.K., Rana, N.P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., Williams, M.D. (2019). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): Towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers, Vol. 21, 719–734. doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
47. Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, 186–204. doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
48. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 3, 425–478. doi.org/10.2307/30036540
49. Schepman, A., Rodway, P. (2023). The General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS): Confirmatory validation and associations with personality, corporate distrust, and general trust. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 39, Issue 14, 2724–2741. doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085409
50. Islam, A., Naseem, A. (2025). Role of Industry 4.0 tools in organizational performance of the IT sector. Kybernetes, Vol. 54, No. 3, 1752–1779. dx.doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2023-1697
51. Al-Adwan, A.S., Li, N., Al-Adwan, A., Abbasi, G.A., Albelbisi, N.A., Habibi, A. (2023). Extending the technology acceptance model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ intentions to use metaverse-based learning platforms. Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 28, 15381–15413. doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11816-3
52. Rožman, M., Oreški, D., Tominc, P. (2023). Artificial-intelligence-supported reduction of employees’ workload to increase the company’s performance in today’s VUCA Environment. Sustainability, Vol. 15, Issue 6, 5019. doi.org/10.3390/su15065019
53. Emon, M.M.H., Khan, T., Rahman, M.A., Siam, S.A.J. (2024). Factors influencing the usage of artificial intelligence among Bangladeshi professionals: Mediating role of attitude towards the technology. IEEE International Conference on Computing, Applications and Systems (COMPAS). IEEE, 1–7. doi.org/10.1109/COMPAS60761.2024.10796110
54. Arslan, A., Cooper, C., Khan, Z., Golgeci, I., Ali, I. (2022). Artificial intelligence and human workers interaction at team level: A conceptual assessment of the challenges and potential HRM strategies. International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 43, No. 1, 75–88. doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2021-0052
55. Hampel, N., Sassenberg, K., Scholl, A., Reichenbach, M. (2022). Introducing digital technologies in the factory: Determinants of blue-collar workers’ attitudes towards new robotic tools. Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 41, Issue 14, 2973–2987. doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1967448
56. Péréa, C., Gérard, J., de Benedittis, J. (2023). Digital sobriety: From awareness of the negative impacts of IT usages to degrowth technology at work. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 194, 122670. doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122670
57. Aruleba, K., Jere, N., Matarirano, O. (2022). An evaluation of technology adoption during remote teaching and learning at tertiary institution by gender. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, Vol. 10, Issue 3, 1335–1346. doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2022.3163912
58. Chanda, R.C., Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Hanifah, H, Ashrafi, D.M., Ahmed, T. (2024). Achieving a sustainable future by analyzing electric vehicle adoption in developing nations through an extended technology acceptance model. Sustainable Futures, Vol. 8, 100386. doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100386
59. Dadhich, M., Rathore, S., Gyamfi, B.A., Ajibade, S.S.M., Agozie, D.Q. (2023). Quantifying the Dynamic Factors Influencing New-Age Users’ Adoption of 5G Using TAM and UTAUT Models in Emerging Country: A Multistage PLS-SEM Approach. Education Research International, Vol. 2023, 5452563. doi.org/10.1155/2023/5452563
About Authors
Saira Saira
M.Sc, Post-Graduate Student, Institute of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID orcid.org/0009-0006-8983-6358 e-mail: sairamaitlo7381@gmail.com
Sheeraz Ali
LLB, Post-Graduate Student, Dadabhoy Institute of Higher Education, Karachi, Pakistan (SNPA, 17/B, Block-3 KCHSU off Shaheed-e-Millat Service Road, Karachi Memon Society P.E.C.H.S., Karachi, 75460, Pakistan); ORCID orcid.org/0009-0004-5128-0409 e-mail: sheerazmashooque@gmail.com
Callistus D. Odeh
M.Sc, Post-Graduate Student, Institute of Economics and Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Ekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID orcid.org/0009-0004-5441-9023 e-mail: callistusodeh@gmail.com
For citation
Saira, S., Ali, S., Odeh, C.D. (2025). The Impact of Technology on Business in the United Arab Emirates: A Technology Acceptance Model Perspective. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, 462-490. doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.2.016
Article info
Received March 11, 2025; Revised March 27, 2025; Accepted May 2, 2025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.2.016
Download full text article:
~750 KB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
14.06.2025)
Created / Updated: 2 September 2015 / 20 September 2021
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
©Ural Federal University named the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin (Website)