Foreign Directors in Russian Public Companies: Determinants of Presence and Impact on Performance

Kasiet M. Kambaralieva

National Research University Higher School of Economics, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

Despite the increased attention in the national scientific literature to corporate governance issues, including those related to boards of directors, relatively little is known about the appointments and role of foreign directors on the boards of Russian companies. In particular, the factors determining the presence of foreign directors on boards have not been fully studied, while the existing results of the influence of foreign directors on the performance of Russian firms remain ambiguous. The purpose of this paper is to obtain a more complete understanding of the place and role of foreigners on the boards of directors of Russian companies. The main hypotheses of the study are the following: the ownership structure indicators as well as the shareholder identity are significant determinants of the presence of foreign directors on boards, while the foreign directors themselves have a positive effect on the companies' corporate performance. Using panel data on 292 Russian public companies and methods of descriptive, statistical and econometric analysis, a gradual decrease in the share of foreigners on boards of directors was revealed during this period. A significant positive effect of the share of foreign ownership on the share of foreign directors on boards, a negative effect of government participation and a nonlinear effect of the share of the largest stakeholder on the probability of attracting foreigners to the boards of directors were also found. However, the evidence of an inverse U-shaped relationship requires taking into account the shareholder identity, specifically, the share of foreign ownership. Finally, a positive effect of foreign directors on market indicators of corporate performance was found using the advanced econometric analysis methods, including those aimed at solving the endogeneity problem. The academic significance of the study stems from filling the gaps in the existing knowledge about foreign directors using detailed data on the population study of non-financial companies traded on the Moscow Exchange. The practical value is due to the possibility of using the results by regulators, large shareholders and the stock market participants especially in the context of the expected easing or lifting of sanctions against Russia.

Keywords

foreign directors; company performance; corporate governance; Russia

JEL classification

References

1. Adams, R.B., Hermalin, B.E., Weisbach, M.S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 48, No. 1, 58–107. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58

         2. Brickley, J.A., Zimmerman, J.L. (2010). Corporate governance myths: comments on Armstrong, Guay, and Weber. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 50, Issues 2-3, 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.002

         3. Adams, R.B., Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 62, Issue 1, 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x

         4. Adams, R.B., Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 94, Issue 2, 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007

         5. Masulis, R.W., Wang, C., Xie, F. (2012). Globalizing the boardroom – The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 53, Issue 3, 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.12.003

         6. Staples, C.L. (2007). Board globalisation in the world’s largest TNCs 1993–2005. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 15, Issue 2, 311–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00573.x

         7. Van Veen, K., Marsman, I. (2008). How international are executive boards of European MNCs? Nationality diversity in 15 European countries. European Management Journal, Vol. 26, Issue 3, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2007.12.001

         8. Krasnov, A.N., Balynin, I.V., Shmeleva, L.A. (2023). Impact of the board of directors’ structure on the company’s financial results. Finance: Theory and Practice, Vol. 27, No. 3, 189–198. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26794/2587-5671-2023-27-3-189-198

         9. Makeeva, E.Y., Popov, K.A., Dikhtyar, A.A., Sudakova, A.V. (2022). Board of directors characteristics: How they are related to ESG rankings and value of Russian companies. Russian Management Journal, Vol. 20, No. 4, 498–523. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2022.403

         10. Popov, K. (2024). Board committee diversity and its effects on financial performance: A study of Russian firms. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, 5–33. https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.18.4.2024.5-33

         11. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, Issue 4, 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X

         12. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, Harper & Row, 300 p. Available at: https://archive.org/details/externalcontrolo0000pfef/page/n9/mode/2up

         13. Harrison, D.A., Klein, K.J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096

         14. Carter, D.A., D'Souza, F., Simkins, B.J., Simpson, W.G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 18, Issue 5, 396–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00809.x

         15. Estélyi, K.S., Nisar, T.M. (2016). Diverse boards: Why do firms get foreign nationals on their boards? Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 39, 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.02.006

         16. Samara, I., Yousef, I. (2023). The impact of foreign directors and firm performance on strategic change. Review of International Business and Strategy, Vol. 33, Issue 3, 466–492. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-10-2021-0137

         17. Miller, T., Del Carmen Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, Issue 5, 755–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00839.x

         18. Van Veen, K., Sahib, P.R., Aangeenbrug, E. (2014). Where do international board members come from? Country-level antecedents of international board member selection in European boards. International Business Review, Vol. 23, Issue 2, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.06.008

         19. Barrios, J.M., Bianchi, P.A., Isidro, H., Nanda, D. (2022). Boards of a feather: Homophily in foreign director appointments around the world. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 60, Issue 4, 1293–1335. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12416

         20. Min, B.S., Chizema, A. (2018). Board meeting attendance by outside directors. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 147, 901–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2990-9

         21. Hahn, P.D., Lasfer, M. (2016). Impact of foreign directors on board meeting frequency. International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 46, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.11.004

         22. García-Meca, E., García-Sánchez, I.M., Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2015). Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: An international analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 53, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.002

         23. Dodd, O., Zheng, B. (2022). Does board cultural diversity contributed by foreign directors improve firm performance? Evidence from Australia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, Vol. 15, Issue 8, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15080332

         24. Ivashkovskaya, I.V., Makeeva, E.Y., Popov, K.A. (2024). Board of directors in Russian companies in the context of ESG transformation. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 10, 42–76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-10-42-76

         25. Verenikin, A.O., Makhankova, N.A., Verenikina, A.Y. (2021). Measuring sustainability of Russian largest companies. Russian Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 3, 237–287. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu18.2021.301

         26. Muravyev, A. (2017). Boards of directors in Russian publicly traded companies in 1998–2014: Structure, dynamics and performance effects. Economic Systems, Vol. 41, Issue 1, 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.12.001

         27. Ruzhanskaya, L. S. (2007). Development of the board of directors as an internal mechanism of corporate governance. Journal of Corporate Finance Research, Vol. 1, No. 4, 14–33. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.1.4.2007.14-33

         28. Nazarova, V.V., Emelyanova, E.O. (2020). Dividend policy of Russian companies with state participation: Influence of the board of directors. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, Vol. 19, No. 1, 97–125. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2020.104

         29. Verbeek, M. (2017). Guide to Modern Econometrics. 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, 429 p. Available at: https://thenigerianprofessionalaccountant.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/modern-econometrics.pdf

         30. Maddala, G. (1983). Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810176

         31. Garanina, T., Muravyev, A. (2021). The gender composition of corporate boards and firm performance: Evidence from Russia. Emerging Markets Review, Vol. 48, 100772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100772

         32. Liu, Y., Wei, Z., Xie, F. (2014). Do women directors improve firm performance in China? Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 28, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.016

         33. Marinova, J., Plantenga, J., Remery, C. (2016). Gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from Dutch and Danish boardrooms. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 27, Issue 15, 1777–1790. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1079229

         34. Blundell, R., Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 87, Issue 1, 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8

         35. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, Vol. 9, Issue 1, 86–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0900900106

         36. Schmid, S., Roedder, F. (2021). Gaijin invasion? A resource dependence perspective on foreign ownership and foreign directors. International Business Review, Vol. 30, Issue 6, 101861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101861

         37. Miletkov, M., Poulsen, A., Wintoki, M.B. (2017). Foreign independent directors and the quality of legal institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 48, 267–292. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-016-0033-0

         38. Tran, Q.T. (2020). Ownership structure and demand for independent directors: Evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Economics and Development, Vol. 22, No. 2, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/JED-03-2020-0022

About Authors

Kasiet Maratovna Kambaralieva

Post-Graduate Student of Department of Economics, Lecturer of Department of Finance, School of Economics and Management, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Saint Petersburg Campus, Saint Petersburg, Russia (194100, Saint Petersburg, Kantemirovskaya street, 3A); ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3361-7847 e-mail: k.kambaralieva@hse.ru

For citation

Kambaralieva, K.M. (2025). Foreign Directors in Russian Public Companies: Determinants of Presence and Impact on Performance. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, ... https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.2.021

Article info

Received February 24, 2025; Revised April 15, 2025; Accepted April 16, 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.2.021

Download full text article: