The Impact of Electronic Tax Services on the Tax Behavior of Economic Entities: The Case of the Russian Forestry Complex

Iulia E. Labunets 1, Igor A. Mayburov 2,3, Sofia A. Matytsina 1, Alexander V. Karin 1, Aleksey O. Krahin 1

1 Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, Tomsk, Russia
2 Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Ekaterinburg, Russia
3 Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

The relevance of the study is due to the growing role of information technologies in government regulation processes in general, and in tax administration in particular. The purpose of the study is to determine the impact of electronic services provided by the Federal Tax Service of Russia on the tax behavior of businesses, using the Russian forest industry as a case study. Two hypotheses guide the analysis: (1) electronic tax services enhance compliance with tax legislation; (2) these services do not reduce the level of tax evasion in the behavior of micro, small and medium enterprises. The study is based on a representative sample of 4,300 micro, small and medium enterprises operating in logging, sawmilling and wholesale timber trade. The taxpayers' behavior in compliance with tax legislation was characterized by a study of the dynamics of tax revenues from micro, small and medium enterprises for the period 2017–2024. For the same period, the analysis of data on current tax and fee debt of the respondents of the sample was conducted, and judicial records concerning tax offenses by the sampled firms were studied. The tax behavior of businesses in tax evasion was assessed by the level of tax risk, defined as an aggregated indicator of violations of the values of the criteria of the concept of planning an on-site tax audit. The results of the study established a strong relationship between the use of tax services and an increase in the level of compliance with the legislation on taxes and fees, which confirms the first hypothesis. At the same time, the analysis of the dynamics of the level of tax risk of the respondents for each year of the study period showed the absence of an impact on it of the tax services system, which, thus, confirms the second hypothesis. The results will allow us to calculate more detailed effects of the influence of various electronic services of the tax service on the types of tax behavior depending on the functionality of the services, the speed of their updating, expansion, quality improvement, the industry affiliation of the activities of business entities and other parameters.

Keywords

tax service; tax behavior; tax evasion; tax compliance; interrelation.

JEL classification

References

1. Alm, J. (2019). What motivates tax compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 33, Issue 2, 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12272

          2. Snow, A., Warren, R.S. (2005). Ambiguity about audit probability, tax compliance, and taxpayer welfare. Economic Inquiry, Vol. 43, Issue 4, 865–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/ei/cbi066

          3. Alm, J. (2014). Expanding the theory of tax compliance from individual to group motivations. In: A Handbook of Alternative Theories in Public Economics. Edited by F. Forte, R. Mudambi, P. Navarra. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, Edward Elgar Publishing, 260–277. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781004715.00020

          4. Dhami, S., al-Nowaihi, A. (2007). Why do people pay taxes? Prospect theory versus expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 64, Issue 1, 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2006.08.006

          5. Braithwaite, V. (2009). Defiance in Taxation and Governance – Resisting and Dismissing Authority in a Democracy. Cheltenham, UK; Northhampton, MA, Edward Elgar Publishing, 384 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781848449077

          6. Becker, G.S. (1968). Crime and punishment – An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 76, No. 2, 169–217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394

          7. Allingam, M.G., Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 1, Issue 3-4, 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2

          8. Alm, J., Torgler, B. (2012). Do ethics matter? Tax compliance and morality. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 101, 635–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0761-9

          9. Bruns, C., Fochmann, M., Mohr, P.N.C., Torgler, B. (2024). Multidimensional Tax Compliance Attitude. School of Business & Economics Discussion Paper, No. 2023/7. Freie Universität Berlin, 60 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4608246

          10. Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Pantya, J., Belianin, A., Kirchler, E. (2013). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: Testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 34, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.010

          11. Li, J., Wang, X., Wu, Y. (2020). Can government improve tax compliance by adopting advanced information technology? Evidence from the Golden Tax Project III in China. Economic Modelling, Vol. 93, 384–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.08.009

          12. Dularif, M., Rustiarini, N.W. (2022). Tax compliance and non-deterrence approach: a systematic review. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Vol. 42, Issue 11-12, 1080–1108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-04-2021-0108

          13. Alm, J., Cherry, T., Jones, M., McKee, M. (2010). Taxpayer information assistance services and tax compliance behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 31, Issue 4, 577–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.018

          14. Ayoola, T.J., Olaniyi, O.O., Kolawole, P.E., Aregbesola, O.D., Wright, O. (2023). Tax administration, trust in tax authorities, and personal income tax compliance: Evidence from Nigeria. Public and Municipal Finance, Vol. 12, Issue 1, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.21511/pmf.12(1).2023.02

          15. Belahouaoui, R., Attak, E.H. (2024). Digital taxation, artificial intelligence and Tax Administration 3.0: improving tax compliance behavior – a systematic literature review using textometry (2016–2023). Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 37, Issue 2, 172–191. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-12-2023-0372

          16. Mallick, H. (2021). Do governance quality and ICT infrastructure influence the tax revenue mobilisation? An empirical analysis for India. Economic Change and Restructuring, Vol. 54, 371–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-020-09282-9

          17. Night, S., Bananuka, J. (2020). The mediating role of adoption of an electronic tax system in the relationship between attitude towards electronic tax system and tax compliance. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, Vol. 25, Issue 49, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEFAS-07-2018-0066

          18. Devano, S., Mulyani, S., Winarningsih, S., Ghani, E.K. (2023). Tax officers’ perceived relationship of e-taxation use, taxpayer satisfaction and taxpayer compliance. Asian Economic and Financial Review, Vol. 13, No. 10, 687–699. https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v13i10.4848

          19. Abdellatif, M., Tran-Nam, B. (2023). Assessing value added tax compliance burden in Gulf Cooperation Council countries. eJournal of Tax Research, Vol. 21, No. 2, 301–332. Available at: https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/eJlTaxR/2023/18.pdf

          20. Stiglingh, M. (2014). A measuring instrument to evaluate e-service quality in a revenue authority setting. Public Relations Review, Vol. 40, Issue 2, 216–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.12.001

          21. Augustine, A.A., Folajimi, A.F., Ayodele, A.L. (2020). Quality of Tax Services, Moderated by Trust in State Internal Revenue Service and Voluntary Tax Compliance Behaviour among Individual Taxpayers in South-West, Nigeria. Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.20448/2002.82.47.57

          22. Huiskers-Stoop, E.A.M., Gribnau, J.L.M. (2019). Cooperative Compliance and the Dutch Horizontal Monitoring Model. Journal of Tax Administration, Vol. 5, No. 1, 66–110. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3333347

          23. Sapidin, S., Abdul Aziz, S., Bidin, Z. (2025). Understanding The Role of Tax Services In Shaping Compliance Behavior: A Systematic Literature Review. Advanced International Journal of Business Entrepreneurship and SMEs, Vol. 7, No. 24, 187–208. https://doi.org/10.35631/AIJBES.724013

          24. Saptono, P.B., Hodžic, S., Khozen, I., Mahmud, G., Pratiwi, I., Purwanto, D., Aditama, M.A., Haq, N., Khodijah, S. (2023). Quality of e-tax system and tax compliance intention: the mediating role of user satisfaction. Informatics, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010022

          25. Okunogbe, O., Santoro, F. (2022). The Promise and Limitations of Information Technology for Tax Mobilization. The World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 38, Issue 2, 295–324. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkac008

          26. Heriel, E.N., Vaishali, J.S. (2024). The Influence of Tax Service Quality on Presumptive Taxpayers’ Compliance in Tanzania: A Case of Ilala Tax Region. African Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, Vol. 7, Issue 1, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.52589/AJESD-UESUSVE6

          27. Au, L.T.N., Hoang, H.T. Ho, L.T.H. (2023). Tax service quality for enterprises: development of a valid measurement scale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, Vol. 15, Issue 3, 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-01-2021-0033

          28. Bassey, E., Mulligan, E., Ojo, A. (2022). A Conceptual Framework for Digital Tax Administration – A Systematic Review. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 39, Issue 4, 101754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101754

          29. Umar, M.A., Masud, A. (2020). Why information technology is constrained in tackling tax noncompliance in developing countries: Nigerian tax administrators’ perspectives. Accounting Research Journal, Vol. 33, Issue 2, 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-11-2018-0205

          30. Otekunrin, A.O., Nwanji, T.I., Eluyela, D.F., Inegbedion, H., Eleda, T. (2021). E-tax system effectiveness in reducing tax evasion in Nigeria. Problems and Perspectives in Management, Vol. 19, Issue 4, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.15

          31. Alm, J. (2021). Tax evasion, technology, and inequality. Economics of Governance, Vol. 22, 321–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-021-00247-w

          32. Uyar, A., Nimer, K., Kuzey, C., Shahbaz, M., Schneider, F. (2021). Can e-government initiatives alleviate tax evasion? The moderation effect of ICT. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 166, 120597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120597

          33. Nurkholis, N., Dularif, M., Rustiarini, N.W. (2020). Tax evasion and service-trust paradigm: A meta-analysis. Cogent Business & Management, Vol. 7, Issue 1, 1827699. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1827699

          34. Agusti, R.R., Rahman, A.F. (2022). Determinants of tax attitude in small and medium enterprises: Evidence from Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 2160585. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2160585

          35. Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Olsen, J., Kogler, C., Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., Weiss, A., Torgler, B., Fooken, J., Fuller, J. (2019). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 74. 102191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.102191

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the reviewers for their suggestions and comments, which provided very scientific guidance for this study.

The article was prepared based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budgetary funds under the state assignment of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation.

About Authors

Iulia Evgenievna Labunets

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Security, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, Tomsk, Russia (634050, Tomsk, Lenin prospekt, 40); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8522-4115 e-mail: ulya.ev_84@mail.ru

Igor Anatolievich Mayburov

Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of the Department of Financial and Tax Management, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); Chief Researcher, Institute for Research of Social and Economic Changes and Financial Policy, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia (125167, Moscow, Leningradsky prospekt, 49/2); https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8791-665X e-mail: mayburov.home@gmail.com

Sofia Antonovna Matytsina

Student, Faculty of Security, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, Tomsk, Russia (634050, Tomsk, Lenin prospekt, 40); ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2705-1041 e-mail: matytsina10.00@mail.ru

Alexander Valerievich Karin

Student, Faculty of Security, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, Tomsk, Russia (634050, Tomsk, Lenin prospekt, 40); ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7542-0224 e-mail: karin.shura@mail.ru

Aleksey Olegovich Krahin

student of Faculty of Security, Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics, Tomsk, Russia (40 Lenin Prospect,634050, Tomsk, Russian Federation); ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7377-9660 e-mail: krahin.a@mail.ru

For citation

Labunets, I.E., Mayburov, I.A., Matytsina, S.A., Karin, A.V., Krahin, A.O. (2025). The Impact of Electronic Tax Service Services on the Tax Behavior of Economic Entities: The Case of the Russian Forestry Complex. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1475-1510. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.4.048

Article info

Received April 22, 2025; Revised July 27, 2025; Accepted August 19, 2025.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.4.048

Download full text article: