Journal of Applied Economic Research
ISSN 2712-7435
Assessment of Economic Security of Russian Construction Companies
Vadim V. Krivorotov 1, Alexei V. Kalina 1,2, Georgy L. Kondrashkin 1
1 Ural Federal University named after the First President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia
2 Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia
Abstract
The operations of construction companies in modern Russian conditions are subject to significant shocks stemming from the deterioration of macroeconomic conditions, the reduction of large-scale mortgage programs, the increase in the key interest rate by the Central Bank of Russia and a number of other trends and processes. This, in turn, makes it urgent to ensure the economic security of Russian construction companies, which is the key to their survival and competitiveness in dynamically changing markets. This study aims to develop and practically implement methodological tools for assessing the economic security of construction companies and their constituent organizations, based on a comprehensive evaluation of various dimensions and aspects of corporate activity. The study is guided by two hypotheses: 1) it is possible to create a comprehensive universal methodological toolkit that makes it possible to assess the economic security of individual companies, groups of companies and to perform a comparative analysis of companies belonging to various groups (associations); 2) moderately low and very low economic security indicators of companies and organizations that are a structural element (division) of large federal-level real estate companies will not have a significant impact on their activities, but will depend on the performance of other companies of the group and the group as a whole. The case study is LLC "LSR. Stroitelstvo – Ural", which is part of the group of companies of Russia's largest federal developer LSR, as well as divisions of other large federal real estate companies operating in the Ural region. The proposed methodological approach was based on indicator analysis, which is based on assessing the economic security of a company in the context of four blocks of indicators reflecting various aspects of companies' activities, and using universal approaches and algorithms to obtain comparable estimates for various indicators and companies, as well as aggregate (summary) assessments of the economic security of companies. The testing of the methodological tools has shown their feasibility and versatility, as well as the possibility of widespread use in solving problems of development and management of economic security of construction companies and related activities and industries.
Keywords
construction company; economic security; economic security assessment; assessment methodolo-gy; indicative analysis; normalization of indicators.
JEL classification
D22, L74References
1. Machovski, H. (1985). Ost-West Handle: Entwicklung, Interessenlagen, Aussichten. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, No. 5, 5−18. Available at: https://www.bpb.de/shop/zeitschriften/apuz/archiv/533312/ost-west-handel-entwicklung-interessenlagen-aussichten/
2. Maull, H. (1984). Raw Materials, Energy and Western Security. London, Macmillan, 413 p. Available at: archive.org/details/rawmaterialsener0000maul
3. Pylypenko, K.A., Babiy, I.V., Volkova, N.V., Feofanov, L.K., Kashchena, N.B. (2019). Structuring economic security of the organization. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, Vol. 9, No. 1, 27–38. http://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2019.9.1(3)
4. Belás, J., Mišanková, M., Schönfeld, J., Gavurová, B. (2017). Credit risk management: financial safety and sustainability aspects. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, Vol. 7, No. 1, 79–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2017.6.1(7)
5. Ianioglo, A. (2015). Comprehensive system of ensuring the economic security of enterprise. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Vol. 1, No. 1, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2015.01.01.07
6. Ianioglo, A., Polajeva, T. (2017). Innovative component of economic security of enterprises: A case of the Republic of Moldova. Journal of Business Economics and Management, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1228–1242. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1405365
7. Jankelová, N., Jankurová, A., Beňová, M., Skorková, Z. (2018). Security of the business organizations as a result of the economic crisis. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, Vol. 5, No. 3, 659–671. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(18)
8. Khalina, O., Bazyliuk, V., Chornenka, O., Krasilych, I., Korzh, M. (2019). Formation of organizational support for the management of the economic security of engineering enterprises: methodical and practical aspects. Business: Theory and Practice, Vol. 20, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2019.30
9. Raczkowski, K., Schneider, F. (2013). The Economic Security of Business Transactions. Management in Business, Oxford, Chartridge Books, 448 p. Available at: https://open.icm.edu.pl/handle/123456789/2904
10. Tvaronavičienė, M., Masood, O., Javaria, K. (2018). Preconditions of the Eurozone economic security: how to overcome liquidity risk and cost inefficiency in leading banks of UK and Germany. Polish Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 18, No. 1, 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2018.18.1.31
11. Raudeliūnienė, J., Tvaronavičienė, M., Dzemyda, I. (2014). Towards economic security and sustainability: key success factors of sustainable entrepreneurship in conditions of global economy. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, Vol. 3, No. 4, 71–79. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(15)
12. Wysokińska-Senkus, A., Raczkowski, K. (2013). Economic security in the context of sustainability. Proceedings of Rural development 2013: The Sixth International Scientific Conference, Vol. 6, Book 1. Kaunas, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 454–462. http://doi.org/10.15544/rd.2013.1.078
13. Strelcova, S., Rehak, D., Johnson, D. (2015). Influence of Critical Infrastructure on Enterprise Economic Security. Communications – Scientific Letters of the University of Zilina, Vol. 17, No. 1, 105–110. http://doi.org/10.26552/com.C.2015.1.105-110
14. Tamošiūnienė, R., Munteanu, C. (2015). Current research approaches to economic security. Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Business Management. Valencia, Spain, Universitat Politècnica de València, 62–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/ICBM.2015.1537
15. Vivchar, O. (2016). Management system interpreting financial and economic security business in economic processes. IEJME – Mathematics Education, Vol. 11, No. 4. 947–959. Available at: https://www.iejme.com/download/management-system-interpreting-financial-and-economic-security-business-in-economic-processes.pdf
16. Avanesova, N., Chuprin, Y. (2017). Enterprise economic security: Essential characteristics of the concept. Innovative Technologies and Scientific Solutions for Industries, No. 1, 98–102. https://doi.org/10.30837/2522-9818.2017.1.098
17. Blakyta, G., Ganushchak, T. (2018). Enterprise financial security as a component of the economic security of the state. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Vol. 15, Issue 2, 248–256. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(2).2018.22
18. Ostapiuk, N., Karmaza, O., Kurylo, M., Timchenko, G. (2017). Economic security in investment projects management: convergence of accounting mechanisms. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Vol. 14, Issue 3, 353–360. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.14(3-2).2017.06
19. Shynkar, S., Gontar, Z., Dubyna, M., Nasypaiko, D., Fleychuk, M. (2021). Assessment of economic security of enterprises: Theoretical and methodological aspects. Business: Theory and Practice, Vol. 21, Issue 1, 261–271. https://doi.org/10.3846/btp.2020.11573
20. Hacker, J.S., Huber, G., Nichols, A., Rehm, F., Schlesinger, M., Valletta, R.G., Craig, S. (2014). The Economic Security Index: A New Measure for Research and Policy Analysis. Special Issue: Economic Insecurity: Challenges, Issues and Findings. Vol. 60(1). S5-S32. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12053
21. Munteanu, C., Tamošiūnienė, R. (2015). Modern approaches in quantifying economic security. Case study of Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Republic of Moldova. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, Vol. 4, No. 4, 596–610. http://dx.doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.4.4(2)S
22. Altman, E.I., Sabato, G., Wilson, N. (2010). The Value of Non-Financial Information in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Credit Risk, Vol. 6, No. 2, 95–127. https://doi.org/10.21314/JCR.2010.110
23. Behr, P. Guttler, A. (2017). Credit Risk Assessment and Relationship Lending: An Empirical Analysis of German Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 45, Issue 2, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2007.00209.x
24. Hackbarth, D., Miao, J., Morellec, E. (2006). Capital structure, credit risk, and macroeconomic conditions. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 82, Issue 3, 519–550. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.10.003
25. Leopoulos, V.N., Kirytopoulos, K.A., Malandrakis, C. (2006). Risk management for SMEs: Tools to use and how. Production Planning & Control, Vol. 17, Issue 3, 322–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537280500285136
26. Pervan, I., Kuvek, T. (2013). The relevant Importance of Financial Ratios and Non-Financial variables in Predicting of Insolvency. Croatian Operational Research Review, Vol. 4, No. 1, 187–197. Available at: https://hrcak.srce.hr/en/97397
27. Alkhatib, K., Al Bzour, A.E. (2011). Predicting Corporate Bankruptcy of Jordanian Listed Companies: Using Altman and Kida Models. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 6, No. 3, 208–215. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n3p208
28. Handayani, N., Winarningsih, S. (2020). The Effect of Net Profit Margin and Return on Equity Toward Profit Growth. Moneter – Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol. 7, No. 2, 198–204. https://doi.org/10.31294/moneter.v7i2.8701
29. Madushanka, K.H.I., Jathurika, M. (2018). The Impact of Liquidity Ratios on Profitability (With special reference to Listed Manufacturing Companies in Sri Lanka). International Research Journal of Advanced Engineering and Science, Vol. 3, Issue 4, 157–161. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2539287
30. Frumusanu, N.-M. (2012). Cash and liquidity/liquidity and liquidity ratio. Annals of the "Constantin Brâncuşi" University of Târgu Jiu, Economy Series, Vol. 4, 78–82. Available at: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2012-04.I/11_BREUER%20Adela.pdf
31. Nuryani, Y., Sunarsi, D. (2020). The Effect of Current Ratio and Debt to Equity Ratio on Deviding Growth. Jurnal Akuntansi, Vol. 4, No. 2, 304–312. https://doi.org/10.36555/jasa.v4i2.1378
32. Ovechkina, O.N. (2013). The concept and methodology of assessing the financial security of an enterprise. Economic and Legal Issues, No. 3, 87–92. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.law-journal.ru/files/pdf/201303/201303_87.pdf
33. Horev, A.I., Sheremetov, A.Ju., Barkalova, I.I. (2016). Resource-functional approach as a method of ensuring the economic security of an enterprise. Economy. Innovation. Quality management, No. 4, 76–78. (In Russ.). Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?edn=ygkfoz
34. Agibalov, A.V., Zaporozhtseva, L.A. (2014). The concept of assessing the level of strategic economic security of an enterprise. Socio-Economic Phenomena and Processes, Vol. 9, No. 11, 78–85. (In Russ.). Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptsiya-otsenki-urovnya-strategicheskoy-ekonomicheskoy-bezopasnosti-predpriyatiya
35. Krivorotov, V.V., Kalina, A.V., Kondrashkin, G.L. (2024). Assessment of economic security of a large construction company on the example of LLC “LSR. Construction–Ural”. The Economy under Guard, No. 3, 41–52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.36511/2588-0071-2024-3-41-52
36. Krivorotov, V.V., Kalina, A.V., Erypalov, S.E., Kondrashkin, G.L., Levshenyuk, R.V. (2024). Ensuring the Safe Competitive Development of Domestic Companies: A Monograph. Edited by V.V. Krivorotov. Moscow, UNITY-DANA, 227 p. (In Russ.). Available at: https://elar.urfu.ru/handle/10995/140134
About Authors
Vadim Vasilyevich Krivorotov
Doctor of Economics, Professor, Head of Department of Economic Safety of Industrial Complexes, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-0325 e-mail: v_krivorotov@mail.ru
Alexei Vladimirovich Kalina
Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Safety of Industrial Complexes, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19), Senior Researcher, The Center of Economic Security, Institute of Economics, The Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620014, Yekaterinburg, Moskovskaya street, 29); ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0376-2505 e-mail: alexkalina74@yandex.ru
Georgy Leonidovich Kondrashkin
Post-Graduate Student, Department of Economic Safety of Industrial Complexes, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N. Yeltsin, Yekaterinburg, Russia (620002, Yekaterinburg, Mira street, 19); ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8453-5878 e-mail: georgekondrashkin@yandex.ru
For citation
Krivorotov, V.V., Kalina, A.V., Kondrashkin, G.L. (2025). Assessment of Economic Security of Russian Construction Companies. Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, 957-989. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.3.032
Article info
Received March 10, 2025; Revised July 3, 2025; Accepted July 16, 2025.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2025.24.3.032
Download full text article:
~705 KB, *.pdf
(Uploaded
10.09.2025)
Created / Updated: 2 September 2015 / 20 September 2021
© Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»
Remarks?
select the text and press:
Ctrl + Enter
Portal design: Artsofte
©Ural Federal University named the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin (Website)